In this case, you have to throw an exception for a user-defined converter? -----Message d'origine----- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Jason Carreira Envoye : lundi 29 septembre 2003 20:32 A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details
I'm working on the type conversion code to add field errors. They will be keyed like this: invalid.fieldvalue.xxx Where xxx is your field name. It will also have a default message which will be shown if the above key could not be found in the Action's resource bundle. > -----Original Message----- > From: Fred Lamuette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 2:20 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details > > > Ok, you say "Type conversion handle this". But when will be > planned that the user-defined converters add a field error > (maybe with a specific Exception thrown as you said) ? > Cheers. Richard. > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > la part de Jason Carreira Envoye : samedi 27 septembre 2003 > 14:19 A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details > > > You thought what I said was overcomplicated? This sounds WAY > too complicated... Type conversion handles this... > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Fred Lamuette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 1:53 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details > > > > > > In fact, this way of thinking is overcomplicated. Why cant we add > > another level of validation. > > > > Level 1 before ParamsInterceptor : > > I validate the representation types of input parameters > > (ActionContext.getContext().getParameters()) > > For instance, a string represents really a date. > > > > Level 2 after ParamsInterceptor : > > I validate the bean data. > > For instance, date1 is not null, date1>date2, ... > > > > Any remarks ? > > Cheers. > > Richard. > > > > -----Message d'origine----- > > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > la part de Jason Carreira Envoye : vendredi 26 septembre > 2003 16:54 A > > : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Objet : RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Fred Lamuette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > My question : how can i do to see the message "Your text > "Foo Bar" > > > could not be parsed as a date", what can i do in my > > dateconverter to > > > add a FieldError ???? > > > > > > Cheers. > > > Richard. > > > > Short answer: You can't > > Long answer: You can't, yet... > > > > I'm trying to figure out if it's ok for you if we figure out how to > > make the converter add a field error, but then the > > RequiredFieldValidator is also going to add a message. > > > > I think we can do this with a custom runtime error... > > > > throw new XworkTypeConversionMessageException("Your text '" > + value + > > "' could not be parsed as a date"); > > > > The type conversion framework can be made to catch this > exception type > > and add the message from it to the field errors. > > > > Jason > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
