I'm against Pico support, only because I don't like the idea of forcing my components to have constructors. I'd rather implement an interface than "kind of" implement an implicit interface by using strict constructor rules. If support is added back in for Pico, I'd rather it be optional, like the Avalon support. As it is, the existing IoC implementation is nice and lightweight (and also, I believe, optional).
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mathias Bogaert Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 1:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Re[2]: [OS-webwork] Avalon Components w/ WebWork2 I'm all for putting support for PicoContainer back in! Mathias ----- Original Message ----- From: "christoph sturm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jason Carreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 12:28 PM Subject: Re[2]: [OS-webwork] Avalon Components w/ WebWork2 > Hello all! > > I have created implemented support for webwork2, and i will post it > today or tomorrow. > > regards > chris > > Tuesday, October 7, 2003, 2:53:48 AM, you wrote: > > JC> I believe it's another module next to webwork on dev.java.net > JC> CVS... I haven't checked it out yet, though... > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > >> Of Eric Pugh > >> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 2:46 PM > >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Avalon Components w/ WebWork2 > >> > >> > >> I picked it up reading some email archive. Was the work to > >> integrate PicoContainer committed to CVS anywhere? Is > >> webwork-extensions an OpenSymphony project? That might give me the > >> pointer I need.. Although it seems straightforward.. > >> > >> Eric Pugh > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- > >> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Behalf Of > >> > Jason Carreira > >> > Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 8:14 PM > >> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Avalon Components w/ WebWork2 > >> > > >> > > >> > I haven't heard of any effort to integrate Avalon and > >> XW/WW2... Some > >> > months ago, there was some work on integrating > >> PicoContainer, but that > >> > has moved into webwork-extensions. There's also been some talk of > >> > integrating Spring's BeanFactory... > >> > > >> > > -----Original Message----- > >> > > From: Eric Pugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 12:56 PM > >> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > Subject: [OS-webwork] Avalon Components w/ WebWork2 > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > Hi all, > >> > > > >> > > I am looking into integrating some existing components that > >> > > were written to use the Avalon IoC scheme. I saw posts a > >> > > couple months back about integrating an Avalon container for > >> > > the sample app, but they didn't seem to go anywhere. The way I > >> > > understand it, WW2 uses XWork as the command pattern providing > >> > > IoC. Therefore theoretically if I can load up a Avalon > >> > > Container just like I would load up any other component. And > >> > > then provide an enabler class that interfaces with the avalon > >> > > container...? > >> > > > >> > > Is there any docs/pointers people can give me? Has anyone > >> > > written a avalon container that runs in WebWork2/Xwork nicely? > >> > > The http://wiki.opensymphony.com/space/WebWork+2> +Components > >> > > page seemed most relevant... > >> > > > >> > > Eric > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > ------------------------------------------------------- > >> > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > >> > > Welcome to geek heaven. > >> > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > >> > > _______________________________________________ > >> > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > >> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > ------------------------------------------------------- > >> > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > >> > Welcome to geek heaven. > >> > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > >> > > > JC> ------------------------------------------------------- > JC> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > JC> Welcome to geek heaven. > JC> http://thinkgeek.com/sf > JC> _______________________________________________ > JC> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > JC> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > JC> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > -- > Best regards, > christoph mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
