Just to clear up any confusion -- Avalon nor Pico nor Spring will be included in WebWork. All of these may or may not be added to the very new (nothing in CVS, or very little) webwork-extensions project.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Pugh Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 4:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Re[2]: [OS-webwork] Avalon Components w/ WebWork2 So Avalon components are supported? Where can I get a look at the source for xwork-avalon? I looked in CVS at xwork.dev.java.net and didn't see anything.. Eric > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Mike Cannon-Brookes > Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 3:00 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Re[2]: [OS-webwork] Avalon Components w/ WebWork2 > > > Well, I'm assuming it wouldn't be enforced. Really I'd like > all of these > 'extensions' to be bundled as separate JARs? > > So you want Pico? > > Add xwork.jar and xwork-pico.jar to your /lib directory and > set some flag in > webwork.properties. > > You want Avalon? xwork.jar and xwork-avalon.jar > > Etc etc? > > M > > On 8/10/03 9:18 AM, "Drew McAuliffe" ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > penned the words: > > > I'm against Pico support, only because I don't like the > idea of forcing > > my components to have constructors. I'd rather implement an > interface > > than "kind of" implement an implicit interface by using strict > > constructor rules. If support is added back in for Pico, > I'd rather it > > be optional, like the Avalon support. As it is, the existing IoC > > implementation is nice and lightweight (and also, I > believe, optional). > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of > > Mathias Bogaert > > Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 1:38 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Re[2]: [OS-webwork] Avalon Components w/ WebWork2 > > > > > > I'm all for putting support for PicoContainer back in! > > > > Mathias > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "christoph sturm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Jason Carreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 12:28 PM > > Subject: Re[2]: [OS-webwork] Avalon Components w/ WebWork2 > > > > > >> Hello all! > >> > >> I have created implemented support for webwork2, and i will post it > >> today or tomorrow. > >> > >> regards > >> chris > >> > >> Tuesday, October 7, 2003, 2:53:48 AM, you wrote: > >> > >> JC> I believe it's another module next to webwork on dev.java.net > >> JC> CVS... I haven't checked it out yet, though... > >> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > > > >>>> Of Eric Pugh > >>>> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 2:46 PM > >>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Avalon Components w/ WebWork2 > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> I picked it up reading some email archive. Was the work to > >>>> integrate PicoContainer committed to CVS anywhere? Is > >>>> webwork-extensions an OpenSymphony project? That might > give me the > > > >>>> pointer I need.. Although it seems straightforward.. > >>>> > >>>> Eric Pugh > >>>> > >>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> Behalf Of > >>>>> Jason Carreira > >>>>> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 8:14 PM > >>>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>> Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Avalon Components w/ WebWork2 > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> I haven't heard of any effort to integrate Avalon and > >>>> XW/WW2... Some > >>>>> months ago, there was some work on integrating > >>>> PicoContainer, but that > >>>>> has moved into webwork-extensions. There's also been > some talk of > > > >>>>> integrating Spring's BeanFactory... > >>>>> > >>>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>>> From: Eric Pugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 12:56 PM > >>>>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>> Subject: [OS-webwork] Avalon Components w/ WebWork2 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hi all, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I am looking into integrating some existing components that > >>>>>> were written to use the Avalon IoC scheme. I saw posts a > >>>>>> couple months back about integrating an Avalon container for > >>>>>> the sample app, but they didn't seem to go anywhere. The way I > > > >>>>>> understand it, WW2 uses XWork as the command pattern providing > >>>>>> IoC. Therefore theoretically if I can load up a Avalon > >>>>>> Container just like I would load up any other component. And > >>>>>> then provide an enabler class that interfaces with the avalon > >>>>>> container...? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Is there any docs/pointers people can give me? Has anyone > >>>>>> written a avalon container that runs in WebWork2/Xwork nicely? > > > >>>>>> The http://wiki.opensymphony.com/space/WebWork+2> +Components > >>>>>> page seemed most relevant... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Eric > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > >>>>>> Welcome to geek heaven. > >>>>>> http://thinkgeek.com/sf > >>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > >>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>> > >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > >>>>> Welcome to geek heaven. > >>>>> http://thinkgeek.com/sf > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > >>>> > >> > >> > >> JC> ------------------------------------------------------- > >> JC> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > >> JC> Welcome to geek heaven. > >> JC> http://thinkgeek.com/sf > >> JC> _______________________________________________ > >> JC> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > >> JC> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> JC> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Best regards, > >> christoph mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------- > >> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > >> Welcome to geek heaven. > >> http://thinkgeek.com/sf > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
