Well, I'm assuming it wouldn't be enforced. Really I'd like all of these 'extensions' to be bundled as separate JARs?
So you want Pico? Add xwork.jar and xwork-pico.jar to your /lib directory and set some flag in webwork.properties. You want Avalon? xwork.jar and xwork-avalon.jar Etc etc? M On 8/10/03 9:18 AM, "Drew McAuliffe" ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) penned the words: > I'm against Pico support, only because I don't like the idea of forcing > my components to have constructors. I'd rather implement an interface > than "kind of" implement an implicit interface by using strict > constructor rules. If support is added back in for Pico, I'd rather it > be optional, like the Avalon support. As it is, the existing IoC > implementation is nice and lightweight (and also, I believe, optional). > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Mathias Bogaert > Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 1:38 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Re[2]: [OS-webwork] Avalon Components w/ WebWork2 > > > I'm all for putting support for PicoContainer back in! > > Mathias > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "christoph sturm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Jason Carreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 12:28 PM > Subject: Re[2]: [OS-webwork] Avalon Components w/ WebWork2 > > >> Hello all! >> >> I have created implemented support for webwork2, and i will post it >> today or tomorrow. >> >> regards >> chris >> >> Tuesday, October 7, 2003, 2:53:48 AM, you wrote: >> >> JC> I believe it's another module next to webwork on dev.java.net >> JC> CVS... I haven't checked it out yet, though... >> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > >>>> Of Eric Pugh >>>> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 2:46 PM >>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Avalon Components w/ WebWork2 >>>> >>>> >>>> I picked it up reading some email archive. Was the work to >>>> integrate PicoContainer committed to CVS anywhere? Is >>>> webwork-extensions an OpenSymphony project? That might give me the > >>>> pointer I need.. Although it seems straightforward.. >>>> >>>> Eric Pugh >>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> Behalf Of >>>>> Jason Carreira >>>>> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 8:14 PM >>>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Avalon Components w/ WebWork2 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I haven't heard of any effort to integrate Avalon and >>>> XW/WW2... Some >>>>> months ago, there was some work on integrating >>>> PicoContainer, but that >>>>> has moved into webwork-extensions. There's also been some talk of > >>>>> integrating Spring's BeanFactory... >>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Eric Pugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 12:56 PM >>>>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>> Subject: [OS-webwork] Avalon Components w/ WebWork2 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> I am looking into integrating some existing components that >>>>>> were written to use the Avalon IoC scheme. I saw posts a >>>>>> couple months back about integrating an Avalon container for >>>>>> the sample app, but they didn't seem to go anywhere. The way I > >>>>>> understand it, WW2 uses XWork as the command pattern providing >>>>>> IoC. Therefore theoretically if I can load up a Avalon >>>>>> Container just like I would load up any other component. And >>>>>> then provide an enabler class that interfaces with the avalon >>>>>> container...? >>>>>> >>>>>> Is there any docs/pointers people can give me? Has anyone >>>>>> written a avalon container that runs in WebWork2/Xwork nicely? > >>>>>> The http://wiki.opensymphony.com/space/WebWork+2> +Components >>>>>> page seemed most relevant... >>>>>> >>>>>> Eric >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek >>>>>> Welcome to geek heaven. >>>>>> http://thinkgeek.com/sf >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list >>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>> >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek >>>>> Welcome to geek heaven. >>>>> http://thinkgeek.com/sf >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork >>>> >> >> >> JC> ------------------------------------------------------- >> JC> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek >> JC> Welcome to geek heaven. >> JC> http://thinkgeek.com/sf >> JC> _______________________________________________ >> JC> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list >> JC> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> JC> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork >> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> christoph mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek >> Welcome to geek heaven. >> http://thinkgeek.com/sf >> _______________________________________________ >> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork >> >> > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
