Did we ever get an answer back from java.net on this webwork-extensions
module?  I hacked, (emphasis on hacked) a way of loading an avalon container
using
the fulcrum test container
(http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine/fulcrum/fulcrum-testcontainer) but it is
really rough...  

I would love to see what other people have done..  

Eric

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Jason Carreira
> Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 5:19 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Re[2]: [OS-webwork] Avalon Components w/ WebWork2
> 
> 
> Matt,
> 
> How do we get to the webwork-extensions module you created?
> 
> Jason
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrick Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 12:22 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Re[2]: [OS-webwork] Avalon Components w/ WebWork2
> 
> Just to clear up any confusion -- Avalon nor Pico nor Spring will be
> included in WebWork. All of these may or may not be added to the very
> new (nothing in CVS, or very little) webwork-extensions project.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Eric Pugh
> Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 4:05 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Re[2]: [OS-webwork] Avalon Components w/ WebWork2
> 
> So Avalon components are supported?  Where can I get a look at the
> source
> for xwork-avalon?  I looked in CVS at xwork.dev.java.net and 
> didn't see
> anything..
> 
> Eric
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Behalf Of
> > Mike Cannon-Brookes
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 3:00 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Re[2]: [OS-webwork] Avalon Components w/ WebWork2
> >
> >
> > Well, I'm assuming it wouldn't be enforced. Really I'd like
> > all of these
> > 'extensions' to be bundled as separate JARs?
> >
> > So you want Pico?
> >
> > Add xwork.jar and xwork-pico.jar to your /lib directory and
> > set some flag in
> > webwork.properties.
> >
> > You want Avalon? xwork.jar and xwork-avalon.jar
> >
> > Etc etc?
> >
> > M
> >
> > On 8/10/03 9:18 AM, "Drew McAuliffe" ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > penned the words:
> >
> > > I'm against Pico support, only because I don't like the
> > idea of forcing
> > > my components to have constructors. I'd rather implement an
> > interface
> > > than "kind of" implement an implicit interface by using strict
> > > constructor rules. If support is added back in for Pico,
> > I'd rather it
> > > be optional, like the Avalon support. As it is, the existing IoC
> > > implementation is nice and lightweight (and also, I
> > believe, optional).
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Behalf Of
> > > Mathias Bogaert
> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 1:38 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: Re[2]: [OS-webwork] Avalon Components w/ WebWork2
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm all for putting support for PicoContainer back in!
> > >
> > > Mathias
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "christoph sturm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "Jason Carreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 12:28 PM
> > > Subject: Re[2]: [OS-webwork] Avalon Components w/ WebWork2
> > >
> > >
> > >> Hello all!
> > >>
> > >> I have created implemented support for webwork2, and i 
> will post it
> > >> today or tomorrow.
> > >>
> > >> regards
> > >>  chris
> > >>
> > >> Tuesday, October 7, 2003, 2:53:48 AM, you wrote:
> > >>
> > >> JC> I believe it's another module next to webwork on dev.java.net
> > >> JC> CVS... I haven't checked it out yet, though...
> > >>
> > >>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>>>
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> > >
> > >>>> Of Eric Pugh
> > >>>> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 2:46 PM
> > >>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>>> Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Avalon Components w/ WebWork2
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I picked it up reading some email archive.  Was the work to
> > >>>> integrate PicoContainer committed to CVS anywhere?  Is
> > >>>> webwork-extensions an OpenSymphony project?  That might
> > give me the
> > >
> > >>>> pointer I need..  Although it seems straightforward..
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Eric Pugh
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>>>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>>> Behalf Of
> > >>>>> Jason Carreira
> > >>>>> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 8:14 PM
> > >>>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>>>> Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Avalon Components w/ WebWork2
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I haven't heard of any effort to integrate Avalon and
> > >>>> XW/WW2... Some
> > >>>>> months ago, there was some work on integrating
> > >>>> PicoContainer, but that
> > >>>>> has moved into webwork-extensions. There's also been
> > some talk of
> > >
> > >>>>> integrating Spring's BeanFactory...
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>>>>> From: Eric Pugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>>>>> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 12:56 PM
> > >>>>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>>>>> Subject: [OS-webwork] Avalon Components w/ WebWork2
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Hi all,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I am looking into integrating some existing components that
> > >>>>>> were written to use the Avalon IoC scheme.  I saw posts a
> > >>>>>> couple months back about integrating an Avalon container for
> > >>>>>> the sample app, but they didn't seem to go anywhere. 
>  The way I
> > >
> > >>>>>> understand it, WW2 uses XWork as the command pattern 
> providing
> > >>>>>> IoC.  Therefore theoretically if I can load up a Avalon
> > >>>>>> Container just like I would load up any other component.  And
> > >>>>>> then provide an enabler class that interfaces with the avalon
> > >>>>>> container...?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Is there any docs/pointers people can give me?  Has anyone
> > >>>>>> written a avalon container that runs in 
> WebWork2/Xwork nicely?
> > >
> > >>>>>> The http://wiki.opensymphony.com/space/WebWork+2> +Components
> > >>>>>> page seemed most relevant...
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Eric
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>>> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > >>>>>> Welcome to geek heaven.
> > >>>>>> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>>>> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> > >>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>> 
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > >>>>> Welcome to geek heaven.
> > >>>>> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > >>>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>>> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> > >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>>>>
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
> > >>>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> JC> -------------------------------------------------------
> > >> JC> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > >> JC> Welcome to geek heaven.
> > >> JC> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > >> JC> _______________________________________________
> > >> JC> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> > >> JC> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> JC>
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Best regards,
> > >>  christoph                            
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> -------------------------------------------------------
> > >> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > >> Welcome to geek heaven.
> > >> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > > Welcome to geek heaven.
> > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > Welcome to geek heaven.
> > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > _______________________________________________
> > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
> SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects.
> See the people who have HELPED US provide better services:
> Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php
> _______________________________________________
> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
> SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects.
> See the people who have HELPED US provide better services:
> Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php
> _______________________________________________
> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

<<attachment: winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to