On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 1:01 PM, James Carman <jcar...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 6:50 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> > wrote: >> I saw on the blog of the Resin folks that they have their 299 IMPL >> working smoothly together. But, sure, that is "only" a hello world. > > Yes, that was another implementation that I've been looking into. > > What I would *really* love to have is the right API to be able to > access what I need as a framework developer in a > non-implementation-specific way. That way, I wouldn't have to have > special "flavors" of my framework for each implementation that I want > to support (I have an "adapter" SPI). The specification should > address this, IMHO.
+1 I am on the same page! -Matthias > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
