Hi Tomaso, On 10/25/07, Tomaso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > where can I upload the small tgz with the 0.0.epsilon release of > db_persisted engine?
It shouldn't be that big, you can attach it here. > ... I made some tests using the 0.9.15 release, should I do also with > the current svn version? If I integrate it, I will do it against the svn trunk version. But there shouldn't be too many differences. > PS: perhaps this shold go in a separate discussion: > have you noticed that with flows like this > > sequence begin > participant x > participant x > ... > participant x > end > > (the partecipants I used are simple PrintPartecipant, and this happens > also with CachedFilePersistedEngine) > > it happens that if the sequence is large enough, the engine > terminates the execution before the natural workflow conclusion. I > don't know exactly how long the sequence must be to trigger the > stange > behaviour, but with 2000/3000 it breaks...(i discovered this while > testing the > db_persisted_engine to see lots of records on the table....) That'd be great if you could document that issue. I have a few tests with a sequence of 10k participants and they run well, but they are in-memory. I didn't dig too hard into that direction as such a process definition is kind of seldom. My test is test/ft_26_load.rb Best regards, thanks, -- John Mettraux -///- http://jmettraux.openwfe.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OpenWFEru dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
