we (the chairs) are trying to be better about paying attention to when last 
calls
and cals for adoption finish (Warren has set up calendar entries to remind us)

Scott

> On Jan 29, 2015, at 5:10 AM, t.petch <ie...@btconnect.com> wrote:
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bradner, Scott" <s...@harvard.edu>
> To: "Michael MacFaden" <m...@vmware.com>
> Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 1:53 AM
> 
>> no exact number but zero is not enough
>> 
>> any intelligent input would be helpful
> 
> Scott
> 
> This is probably unintelligent, but that is how I am! It is/was on my
> list of things to progress but it comes below e.g.
> draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp
> which has had issues outstanding with it for nearly a year, during which
> the call for adoption took about four months.  That is where the time
> goes, checking, waiting, prodding, wondering, meandering off into
> appsawg whose calls for adoption - despite adopting a leaky bucket
> approach to adoption - seem even more fraught etc.
> 
> So I have commented on this I-D in the past - I tend to read every mib
> module - but will not be doing so just yet.  Perhaps when the shepherd
> write-up for
> draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp
> is complete,
> 
> Tom Petch
> 
>> Scott
>> 
>>> On Jan 28, 2015, at 7:03 PM, Michael MacFaden <m...@vmware.com>
> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Exactly  how many folks need to speak up?
>>> 
>>> We did have operator input on this work.
>>> We can ping them to to send email
>>> to the list...
>>> 
>>> Mike
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Jan 28, 2015, at 3:54 PM, Scott O. Bradner <s...@sobco.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> which is too bad since I think the topic is a useful one
>>>> 
>>>> but, as chairs, we are supposed to do things based on WG consensus
>>>> and if no one speaks up we have no way to know if there is
> consensus
>>>> one way or another
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OPSAWG mailing list
>>> OPSAWG@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> OPSAWG mailing list
>> OPSAWG@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
> 

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to