----- Original Message ----- From: "Linda Dunbar" <linda.dun...@huawei.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 4:12 PM
> Tom, > > Thank you very much for the review and comments. So there is no duplicated work in OpsArea? Linda I suspect that there is duplicated work but the absence of YANG 'reference' statements in the module make that harder to assess. If two YANG modules reference the same section of the same document, then they are likely modelling the same object! Even if the reference is only to the document, it does make comparison easier. Here, there are zero references. There is certainly overlap with work in NETCONF where pull-push, pub-sub and the like have been much debated, often in a seemingly circular manner, with I-Ds such as draft-ietf-netconf-subscribed-notifications draft-ietf-netconf-udp-pub-channel-03 draft-ietf-netconf-yang-push draft-ietf-netconf-netconf-event-notifications draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-notif but that WG is also wrestling with seven client-server drafts which interact with them so I find it hard to keep track of this work. On the approach to event/alarm/notification, there is overlap with draft-ietf-ccamp-alarm-module which is all about alarms and not much to do with ccamp IMHO. This work is an evolution of RFC3877 so is probably the one that you should be familiar with. I think that if this I-D looks different to RFC3877, it is because ITU-T have moved on and we have followed. On the identities, ip, ipv4, ftp etc there is overlap everywhere. Not sure that that helps but that is the IETF. Tom Petch > Authors of the draft-hong-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model: Can you please update the draft per Tom's comments. > > Linda. > > -----Original Message----- > From: tom petch [mailto:ie...@btconnect.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 5:22 AM > To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dun...@huawei.com>; opsawg@ietf.org > Cc: i2...@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] is there any work in Ops Area for monitoring network functions? > > Linda > > I looked at the draft and think that it needs some work before it is a YANG module:-) > > - NMDA conformance is not mentioned > > - the reference to RFC2119 is out of date > > - the format for tree diagrams is now specified in RFC8340 > > - YANG import statements lack 'reference' as in > import ietf-inet-types { > prefix "inet"; > reference "RFC 6991 - Common YANG Data Types"; > > - YANG module has no copyright > > - YANG module has (almost) no reference statements to tell the user (like me) whereto go to understand it. look, for example, at draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang for a module that is well supplied with reference statements > > - YANG module should reference the RFC from which it comes > > - the one and only reference in the YANG module is > reference > "draft-zhang-i2nsf-info-model-monitoring-07"; > but the I-D is > draft-hong-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-06 > I do not understand > > - where you reference an I-D, it needs a Note to the RFC Editor e.g. > reference "draft-zhang-i2nsf-info-model-monitoring-07"; > becomes > reference RFC YYYY "....." > -- Note to RFC Editor please replace YYYY with the number assigned to > "draft-zhang-i2nsf-info-model-monitoring" > > - IANA Considerations must be present > > - Security Considerations must include the YANG template > > HTH:-) > > I am not on the I2NSF list. > > Tom Petch > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Linda Dunbar" <linda.dun...@huawei.com> > To: <opsawg@ietf.org> > Cc: <i2...@ietf.org> > Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2018 5:27 PM > > > OpsaWG: > > > > I2NSF WG has a draft on data models (and information model) of > monitoring network security functions: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hong-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-0 > 6 > > > > It includes data models to retrieve System Alarms, System Events, > counters, NSF Events/logs, etc. > > > > Want to see if there are data models already specified by Ops Area for > monitoring network functions which might have some common attributes that I2NSF can import. > > > > Thanks, Linda Dunbar > > > > From: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong [mailto:jaehoon.p...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 6:35 PM > > To: Linda Dunbar > <linda.dun...@huawei.com<mailto:linda.dun...@huawei.com>>; Yoav Nir <ynir.i...@gmail.com<mailto:ynir.i...@gmail.com>> > > Cc: i2...@ietf.org<mailto:i2...@ietf.org>; > skku_secu-brain_...@googlegroups.com<mailto:skku_secu-brain_all@googlegr > oups.com>; Sangwon Hyun <swhyu...@gmail.com<mailto:swhyu...@gmail.com>>; > Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong > <jaehoon.p...@gmail.com<mailto:jaehoon.p...@gmail.com>> > > Subject: Request for WG Adoption Call on NSF Monitoring Draft > > > > Hi Linda and Yoav, > > As we discussed the last Bangkok meeting, I have merged the two drafts > > of Information Model and Data Model for NSF Monitoring into a new > > draft called > draft-hong-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-06: > > > > - Two Information and Data Model Drafts . > > draft-zhang-i2nsf-info-model-monitoring-07 > > . draft-hong-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-05 > > > > - A Merged Data Model Draft > > . draft-hong-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-06 > > . > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hong-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-0 > 6 > > > > The NSF monitoring is very important to manage the I2NSF security > service system > > in a reliable and scalable fashion. > > > > Could you start a WG adoption call for this draft? > > > > Thanks. > > > > Best Regards, > > Paul > > -- > > =========================== > > Mr. Jaehoon (Paul) Jeong, Ph.D. > > Associate Professor > > Department of Software > > Sungkyunkwan University > > Office: +82-31-299-4957 > > Email: jaehoon.p...@gmail.com<mailto:jaehoon.p...@gmail.com>, > paulje...@skku.edu<mailto:paulje...@skku.edu> > > Personal Homepage: > http://iotlab.skku.edu/people-jaehoon-jeong.php<http://cpslab.skku.edu/p > eople-jaehoon-jeong.php> > > _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
