Ketan Talaulikar <[email protected]> wrote: > Michael/Guy, I would suggest the easiest way to proceed is that one of you > (or anyone else involved from the projects involved) becomes the Change > Controller for the actual registered entries in the initial allocation > -
okay, so I've never seen a person listed in an RFC like this.
Why can't it be the IESG, and the IESG delegates?
> basically you become the registrants. For further requests, the DEs would
> enter the registrant(s) as the change controllers for their respective
> entries.
sure.
> Amanda, do you see an issue with this or do you have a better suggestion?
> Once that is done, this is ready to ship.
?tell me?
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
