Hi Guy,
[AB2] inline. [AB1] For the registrations in the new registry that are going to refer to the RFC rather than tcpdump.org, Are you referring to the registrations that will be made for the linktypes in the current I-D, or to future registrations? [AB2] I’m referring to registrations made by the current I-D, but this question could also come up in the future if an I-D makes additional registrations in the same way (i.e. listing another organization’s website in the reference field). If it's for the registrations for the linktypes in the current I-D, presumably "the RFC" is the one that draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype will become. If so, which of those would refer to the RFC? [AB2] There are a number of registrations in Section 2.2.1 that don’t list a reference (4, 6, and 7 are the first ones I see). When an RFC-to-be registers a name/codepoint without listing a reference for it, we have to assume that the document itself is the intended reference. If it’s going to be an IETF-stream RFC, we would also expect that the IETF would be the change controller. Thanks, Amanda
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
