On Dec 2, 2025, at 12:44 PM, Amanda Baber <[email protected]> wrote: > However, in this case, it looks like we’re not listing the RFC as the > reference for the affected registrations. Instead we’ll be pointing to > different locations at tcpdump.org,
...and other locations, e.g. https://www.radiotap.org/ for LINKTYPE_IEEE802_11_RADIOTAP. > For the registrations in the new registry that are going to refer to the RFC > rather than tcpdump.org, Are you referring to the registrations that will be made for the linktypes in the current I-D, or to future registrations? If it's for the registrations for the linktypes in the current I-D, presumably "the RFC" is the one that draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype will become. If so, which of those would refer to the RFC? If it's for future registrations, to which RFC are you referring?
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
