On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Jay Armstrong wrote: > > But, let's say it doesn't support transactions. What's wrong with starting > a dialog? > Why bother? So the people who bleat about mySQL all the time are happier? Frankly I'd rather the Orion team concentrate on functionality and J2EE implementation, rather than worry about integrating with MySQL when SO many far superior alternatives exist. Have a look at config/database-schemas. In my opinion, Orion should not do ANYTHING to 'conform' to MySQL or adapt to it. If MySQL is fixed in time and has a decent JDBC driver that can support transactions and all else that is required, then this whole ridiculous discussion is moot anyways. Lets move on now! Hani
- Re: A Swedish Idea Joseph B. Ottinger
- RE: A Swedish Idea Kemp Randy-W18971
- Re: A Swedish Idea William Jones
- Re: A Swedish Idea Joseph B. Ottinger
- RE: A Swedish Idea Michael J. Cannon
- RE: A Swedish Idea Michael A Third
- Re: A Swedish Idea Mike Sick
- RE: A Swedish Idea Kemp Randy-W18971
- RE: A Swedish Idea Hani Suleiman
- RE: A Swedish Idea Jay Armstrong
- RE: A Swedish Idea Hani Suleiman
- RE: A Swedish Idea Jay Armstrong
- RE: A Swedish Idea Michael J. Cannon
- RE: A Swedish Idea Neville Burnell
- RE: A Swedish Idea Michael J. Cannon
- RE: A Swedish Idea Kemp Randy-W18971
- RE: A Swedish Idea Kemp Randy-W18971
- RE: A Swedish Idea Hani Suleiman
- RE: A Swedish Idea Kemp Randy-W18971
- RE: A Swedish Idea Hani Suleiman
- Re: A Swedish Idea David Kinnvall