Mike Chambers wrote: > Here is a more up to date discussion on the issue: > > http://lwn.net/Articles/134642/ > > which shows it is not as clear cut of an issue.
Thanks for your input Mike. But I just want to add something to the discussion before it gets any deeper into legal speak. Really I just wanted to make it absolutely clear that the goals here /are/ interoperability and that there is no desire to reverse engineer Macromedia products - and certainly no intent to compete with Macromedia in either a commercial, or non-commercial way. If the next version of the Flash IDE will feature a command line compiler that can be legally used separately from the IDE (e.g. so it can be used under Linux), then there is no longer a requirement for an open source compiler. - IE _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
