As per Samuel Agesilas's comments....

That is exactly why I think AIR is going to take off.
It brings us some of the benefits of both online and offline in a very easy
to use technology.
Sure its not a perfect solution _yet_, but it is still very new and we can
expect it to develop very quickly into something very usable.


On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Samuel Agesilas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> Well mate,
>
> The desktop is FAR from dead. Most of the apps I use on my Mac are
> desktop apps. Both for professional and recreational. There is a huge
> market for software that cannot be made into a web app. Imagine if
> Ableton was a live application, how many night clubs you know are
> equipped
> with broadband wifi.  In my case I could have never written Saffron
> into a web app and still maintain the level of quality and user
> experience I wanted.
>
> The fact is that nothing beats instant on! And desktop applications
> give you that. No sever waits or downloads or caching issues
> or none of that. I think the trend is going to be towards more rich
> client desktop app's that can connect the web but do not depend
> implicitly on an internet
> connection.
>
> Cheers,
> Sam
>
> On Feb 15, 2008, at 4:39 AM, Cedric Muller wrote:
>
> > Failing examples:
> >
> > -....Bring merchants to the desktop, and start to sell on the desktop
> > (IS THAT A JOKE ???)
> >
> > - then, there is AOL.... "With our Adobe AIR application, we can
> > reach communities of users with compelling, free content available
> > from AOL" (They now acknowledge they cannot reach communities of
> > users online ;)
> >
> > - EBAY: The result: people can experience the world's largest online
> > marketplace and engage with eBay services using a compact, intuitive
> > desktop application.
> > Wow really ? So what about revamping the website instead of
> > developping a new interface ? In what sense does AIR feel right ?
> >
> > - The NASDAQ example: Quotes are everywhere, on your mobile on your
> > tv on your paper on your face, but from now on, INVESTORS (gasp!) can
> > follow quotes on their desktop (and this has been done thousand
> > times, and this hasn't helped any investor :) )
> >
> > Really really sorry, I am just a flash programmer, sites and
> > applications, but I cannot feel the marketing crap here.
> >
> > I wonder if anyone at Adobe realized how old skool is the desktop,
> > and how fast everything will move in the next 5 years ??
> >
> > Cedric (ok ok, I am anti-air, but still pro flash platform)
> >
> > ps: the AIR symbol is fun (I see 'empty space')
> >
> >> I am quite intrigued by the hype and trendy comments AIR is receiving
> >> (build with Flash, build with Flex, build with AJAX, build with
> >> Legos, build with your cat, do a Tour, do some Zigs, and other
> >> Zags) .,... I can count on the fingers of my hand the Good and
> >> Functionnal AIR apps that are around ... and all the people
> >> applausing just because the others are
> >> Zinc is just a hell to make it work, but then it just works and IS
> >> functionnal. They don't fancy around and such.
> >>
> >> Now Adobe asking for feedback and such ... :)
> >>
> >> The idea to find Hacks to a 1.0 version is soooo cheap... makes me
> >> wonder what were those people thinking ? (They must have thought
> >> something like: bring the browser to the desktop, but Nah! The
> >> browser overtakes the desktop, so why would be have light apps
> >> running on our desktop ? no sense at all)
> >>
> >> Really ? I am fed up of 'happy and glowing professionals' being over
> >> optimistic on some overall not interesting initiative (actually: we
> >> are all playing the idiots because we don't have any clue, we just
> >> want to do technology and earn money, so we follow, so we
> >> follow, ...). Do your homework, do some yoga (I need such right
> >> now :P ) and bring better things than just doing over hyped
> >> nonsense....
> >>
> >> AIR ist Rad!
> >>
> >> Cedric
> >>
> >>> I totally agree.  Without the ability to launch external apps AIR
> >>> will have a hard time becoming more than a novelty.
> >>>
> >>> By the way, you can also use SQLLite with MDM.
> >>> http://www.thecodezone.com/downloads/sqlite.php
> >>>
> >>> -------------------------------
> >>> Iman Khabazian
> >>> Managing Director, iMAN IT
> >>> 949.231.8042
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> www.imanit.com
> >>> www.scuge.com
> >>> www.imanit.com/blog
> >>>
> >>> On Feb 13, 2008 2:45 PM, Keith Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Even as a hack, it is not pure AIR. It requires installing and
> >>> running another application on your machine. The Artemis project
> >>> does something similar.  I totally agree with what Sam that this
> >>> was a really poor decision. I think most of us would have gladly
> >>> left the SQLLite stuff behind in favor of this.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Keith Peters
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Feb 13, 2008, at 5:38 PM, Iman Khabazian wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> has anyone tried the hack?
> >>>> http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/2008/01/17/commandproxy-net-air-
> >>>> integration-proof-of-concept/
> >>>>
> >>>> -Iman
> >>>> -------------------------------
> >>>> Iman Khabazian
> >>>> Managing Director, iMAN IT
> >>>> 949.231.8042
> >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>> www.imanit.com
> >>>> www.scuge.com
> >>>> www.imanit.com/blog
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Feb 13, 2008 2:31 PM, Samuel Agesilas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>> Yea it is a major, fudge up by Adobe. Essentially with AIR Adobe
> >>>> build the Ferrari of desktop app development, but decided to slash
> >>>> all the tires and put sugar in the gas tank when they  decided to
> >>>> seriously hamper AIR by not allowing calls apps to launch.  Talk
> >>>> about a dumb and stupid decision. and I don't believe Adobe knows
> >>>> how crucial of a feature that is! For example, I had a client come
> >>>> to us to develop a UI for an audio processing software project.
> >>>> For the UI we looked at JavaFX ( which is not quite ready ), Java,
> >>>> QT and Adobe AIR. AIR hit all of the points and the client was
> >>>> ready to roll with AIR except for that crucial fact of not being
> >>>> able to launch external apps. That was the deal breaker and the
> >>>> client walked away from AIR development and decided to go with QT.
> >>>> It's a shame to because that particular project was perfect for
> >>>> Flash + AIR. If anyone at Adobe is reading this, PLEASE stop
> >>>> handicapping your products and start trusting your developer
> >>>> community.
> >>>>
> >>>> my two cents.
> >>>> -sam
> >>>>
> >>>> On Feb 8, 2008, at 6:18 AM, slangeberg wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Yeah, you're right. Not being able to make system calls / launch
> >>>>> apps IS a major shortcoming of AIR, at this point.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Here's an official Adobe statement, as of June:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> src: http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/webforums/forum/messageview.cfm?
> >>>>> catid=641&threadid=1298770&STARTPAGE=2&FTVAR_FORUMVIEWTMP=Linear
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thank you everyone who has contributed to this thread. My name is
> >>>>> Rob Christensen and I'm a product manager on Adobe AIR. I'd like
> >>>>> to provide some clarity on this topic, but also invite you to
> >>>>> share additional thoughts.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The primary reason that AIR 1.0 does not include support for
> >>>>> launching native applications originates from a founding design
> >>>>> decision/philosophy. Applications that do not depend on other
> >>>>> applications to be installed result in a better user experience.
> >>>>> Our goal with AIR has been to deliver a runtime that delivers
> >>>>> applications consistently across operating systems. Please note
> >>>>> that this doesn't mean we're right nor that we might not change
> >>>>> our minds on this.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We'd like to hear what you think on this topic. It's helpful if
> >>>>> you can let us know what you're trying to build. The more
> >>>>> specific you can be, the more helpful it is to our team. Please
> >>>>> reply to this thread or send us a note through our feedback form.
> >>>>> This form will send a message directly to our development and
> >>>>> product management team.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Feedback for (Adobe AIR)
> >>>>> http://www.adobe.com/go/wish/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> As with any design decision, there's plenty of opportunity to
> >>>>> debate the topic and this is something we continue to discuss
> >>>>> even internally. The major disadvantage is that it's much more
> >>>>> difficult to take advantage of existing code libraries or launch
> >>>>> other native applications.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> At the same time, one advantage to the current design is that
> >>>>> when you distribute an application, you do not need to say, "This
> >>>>> is a really great application, but make sure you have Microsoft
> >>>>> Windows (or OSX) installed as well as Microsoft Word (or
> >>>>> Photoshop or some other native product) to really take advantage
> >>>>> of this application."
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Again, we may revisit this decision in the future and as with any
> >>>>> 1.0, you almost always come to reconsider your initial design
> >>>>> goals. There are some interesting options here such as the one
> >>>>> discussed earlier of launching the default application for a
> >>>>> specific file type.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Stuartc11: It is possible to launch a web browser by the way and
> >>>>> some of the sample applications have code that that demonstrate
> >>>>> how to do this.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - Rob
> >>>>> Product Manager, Adobe AIR
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -Scott
> >>>>>
> >>>>> PS: Zinc blows holes in the ozone.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Feb 8, 2008 5:41 AM, Cedric Muller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>> Actually, I was able to launch VLC with Zinc (not Zinc specific,
> >>>>> but
> >>>>> it does manage activex) and pass the HD streams to VLC
> >>>>> now, I am looking at a splitted screen with 4 HD streams, all
> >>>>> totally
> >>>>> fluid.
> >>>>> Ok ok, I have a tough graphic card, but my tests so far indicate
> >>>>> that
> >>>>> there is plenty of margin.
> >>>>> Moreover, with VLC I can load in almost any video type (even
> >>>>> FLVs)...
> >>>>> though i am doing an internal check, and if video is FLV I
> >>>>> stream it
> >>>>> with Flash...
> >>>>> The app I am building is quite technical, and clients' constraints
> >>>>> are very high (regarding HD (and full hd) Streaming). To be
> >>>>> honest,
> >>>>> it isn't a desktop application, more like a 'computer app'
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cedric
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Not to be obtuse, but can you stream HD video with Zinc?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Does streaming HD video establish the validity of a desktop app?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Anyhow, you can stream video with Flash Media Server to the flash
> >>>>>> player (AIR). Probably Red5 too. Right?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Feb 8, 2008 2:02 AM, Cedric Muller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>> yes works well, but quite not a true desktop app: how would you
> >>>>>> stream Full HD video with AIR ?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> yeah, and just to be the rah rah boy - AIR rocks.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> fine, shoot me, but it *works* well
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Feb 7, 2008 7:33 PM, Arnoud Bos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>>> Try screenweaver haxe  (swhx) if you are not afraid of
> >>>>> command line
> >>>>>>> tools.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Works great!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> And it's opensource (this is an open source list, right?)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Arnoud
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:osflash-
> >>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens bean tickler
> >>>>>>> Verzonden: donderdag 7 februari 2008 23:25
> >>>>>>> Aan: [email protected]
> >>>>>>> Onderwerp: [osflash] MDM Zinc v3 rant
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Sad sad sad.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Too long have I and almost everyone I know suffered with this
> >>>>> poor
> >>>>>>> product and its predecessors. 2.5 buggy buggy buggy. V3 beta,
> >>>>> buggy
> >>>>>>> but fine, BETA. V3 RELEASE, same as BETA, not one bug fixed from
> >>>>>>> what I can tell and they have ditched tons of the functionality
> >>>>>>> they had in 2.5!!!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Why oh why do we bother??? Well, at one point they were the
> >>>>> best of
> >>>>>>> a bad bunch with shed loads of commands and slick marketing.
> >>>>>>> However, I feel the competitors have overtaken them. Just
> >>>>> look at
> >>>>>>> the likes of Janus (a new but reliable tool) and SWF studio.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> For me I would have loved to have stayed with SWF Studio but
> >>>>> they
> >>>>>>> had no handheld or Mac output. Janus is my new favorite as it
> >>>>> has
> >>>>>>> yet to cause me an embarrassing client crash and has Mac and
> >>>>> Linux
> >>>>>>> output coming up). But wow, I feel soo dumb for ever buying
> >>>>> Zinc!!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Every negative post on their "community" forum gets deleted,
> >>>>> they
> >>>>>>> are now even checking posts _before_ they go live.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Sorry for the rant. But guessing this post wont be deleted!!!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>> osflash mailing list
> >>>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> [  JPG  ]
> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>> osflash mailing list
> >>>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> osflash mailing list
> >>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> : : ) Scott
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Helping your grandma on the interweb
> >>>>>> at: http://blog.criticalpile.com
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> osflash mailing list
> >>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> osflash mailing list
> >>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> : : ) Scott
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Helping your grandma on the interweb
> >>>>> at: http://blog.criticalpile.com
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> osflash mailing list
> >>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> osflash mailing list
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> osflash mailing list
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> osflash mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> osflash mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> osflash mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > osflash mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> osflash mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
>
_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org

Reply via email to