Man, Adobe is allowing distribution of their runtime in this manner, huh?
Guess I never read the licensing / restrictions!


On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Jethro Grassie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> Take a look at Shu.
>
> http://shu-player.com
>
> Seems to address many of AIR shortcomings.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Jethro Grassie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > As per Samuel Agesilas's comments....
> >
> > That is exactly why I think AIR is going to take off.
> > It brings us some of the benefits of both online and offline in a very
> > easy to use technology.
> > Sure its not a perfect solution _yet_, but it is still very new and we
> > can expect it to develop very quickly into something very usable.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Samuel Agesilas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Well mate,
> > >
> > > The desktop is FAR from dead. Most of the apps I use on my Mac are
> > > desktop apps. Both for professional and recreational. There is a huge
> > > market for software that cannot be made into a web app. Imagine if
> > > Ableton was a live application, how many night clubs you know are
> > > equipped
> > > with broadband wifi.  In my case I could have never written Saffron
> > > into a web app and still maintain the level of quality and user
> > > experience I wanted.
> > >
> > > The fact is that nothing beats instant on! And desktop applications
> > > give you that. No sever waits or downloads or caching issues
> > > or none of that. I think the trend is going to be towards more rich
> > > client desktop app's that can connect the web but do not depend
> > > implicitly on an internet
> > > connection.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Sam
> > >
> > > On Feb 15, 2008, at 4:39 AM, Cedric Muller wrote:
> > >
> > > > Failing examples:
> > > >
> > > > -....Bring merchants to the desktop, and start to sell on the
> > > desktop
> > > > (IS THAT A JOKE ???)
> > > >
> > > > - then, there is AOL.... "With our Adobe AIR application, we can
> > > > reach communities of users with compelling, free content available
> > > > from AOL" (They now acknowledge they cannot reach communities of
> > > > users online ;)
> > > >
> > > > - EBAY: The result: people can experience the world's largest online
> > > > marketplace and engage with eBay services using a compact, intuitive
> > > > desktop application.
> > > > Wow really ? So what about revamping the website instead of
> > > > developping a new interface ? In what sense does AIR feel right ?
> > > >
> > > > - The NASDAQ example: Quotes are everywhere, on your mobile on your
> > > > tv on your paper on your face, but from now on, INVESTORS (gasp!)
> > > can
> > > > follow quotes on their desktop (and this has been done thousand
> > > > times, and this hasn't helped any investor :) )
> > > >
> > > > Really really sorry, I am just a flash programmer, sites and
> > > > applications, but I cannot feel the marketing crap here.
> > > >
> > > > I wonder if anyone at Adobe realized how old skool is the desktop,
> > > > and how fast everything will move in the next 5 years ??
> > > >
> > > > Cedric (ok ok, I am anti-air, but still pro flash platform)
> > > >
> > > > ps: the AIR symbol is fun (I see 'empty space')
> > > >
> > > >> I am quite intrigued by the hype and trendy comments AIR is
> > > receiving
> > > >> (build with Flash, build with Flex, build with AJAX, build with
> > > >> Legos, build with your cat, do a Tour, do some Zigs, and other
> > > >> Zags) .,... I can count on the fingers of my hand the Good and
> > > >> Functionnal AIR apps that are around ... and all the people
> > > >> applausing just because the others are
> > > >> Zinc is just a hell to make it work, but then it just works and IS
> > > >> functionnal. They don't fancy around and such.
> > > >>
> > > >> Now Adobe asking for feedback and such ... :)
> > > >>
> > > >> The idea to find Hacks to a 1.0 version is soooo cheap... makes me
> > > >> wonder what were those people thinking ? (They must have thought
> > > >> something like: bring the browser to the desktop, but Nah! The
> > > >> browser overtakes the desktop, so why would be have light apps
> > > >> running on our desktop ? no sense at all)
> > > >>
> > > >> Really ? I am fed up of 'happy and glowing professionals' being
> > > over
> > > >> optimistic on some overall not interesting initiative (actually: we
> > > >> are all playing the idiots because we don't have any clue, we just
> > > >> want to do technology and earn money, so we follow, so we
> > > >> follow, ...). Do your homework, do some yoga (I need such right
> > > >> now :P ) and bring better things than just doing over hyped
> > > >> nonsense....
> > > >>
> > > >> AIR ist Rad!
> > > >>
> > > >> Cedric
> > > >>
> > > >>> I totally agree.  Without the ability to launch external apps AIR
> > > >>> will have a hard time becoming more than a novelty.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> By the way, you can also use SQLLite with MDM.
> > > >>> http://www.thecodezone.com/downloads/sqlite.php
> > > >>>
> > > >>> -------------------------------
> > > >>> Iman Khabazian
> > > >>> Managing Director, iMAN IT
> > > >>> 949.231.8042
> > > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >>> www.imanit.com
> > > >>> www.scuge.com
> > > >>> www.imanit.com/blog
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Feb 13, 2008 2:45 PM, Keith Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >>> Even as a hack, it is not pure AIR. It requires installing and
> > > >>> running another application on your machine. The Artemis project
> > > >>> does something similar.  I totally agree with what Sam that this
> > > >>> was a really poor decision. I think most of us would have gladly
> > > >>> left the SQLLite stuff behind in favor of this.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Keith Peters
> > > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Feb 13, 2008, at 5:38 PM, Iman Khabazian wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> has anyone tried the hack?
> > > >>>> http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/2008/01/17/commandproxy-net-air-
> > > >>>> integration-proof-of-concept/
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> -Iman
> > > >>>> -------------------------------
> > > >>>> Iman Khabazian
> > > >>>> Managing Director, iMAN IT
> > > >>>> 949.231.8042
> > > >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >>>> www.imanit.com
> > > >>>> www.scuge.com
> > > >>>> www.imanit.com/blog
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Feb 13, 2008 2:31 PM, Samuel Agesilas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >>>> Yea it is a major, fudge up by Adobe. Essentially with AIR Adobe
> > > >>>> build the Ferrari of desktop app development, but decided to
> > > slash
> > > >>>> all the tires and put sugar in the gas tank when they  decided to
> > > >>>> seriously hamper AIR by not allowing calls apps to launch.  Talk
> > > >>>> about a dumb and stupid decision. and I don't believe Adobe knows
> > > >>>> how crucial of a feature that is! For example, I had a client
> > > come
> > > >>>> to us to develop a UI for an audio processing software project.
> > > >>>> For the UI we looked at JavaFX ( which is not quite ready ),
> > > Java,
> > > >>>> QT and Adobe AIR. AIR hit all of the points and the client was
> > > >>>> ready to roll with AIR except for that crucial fact of not being
> > > >>>> able to launch external apps. That was the deal breaker and the
> > > >>>> client walked away from AIR development and decided to go with
> > > QT.
> > > >>>> It's a shame to because that particular project was perfect for
> > > >>>> Flash + AIR. If anyone at Adobe is reading this, PLEASE stop
> > > >>>> handicapping your products and start trusting your developer
> > > >>>> community.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> my two cents.
> > > >>>> -sam
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Feb 8, 2008, at 6:18 AM, slangeberg wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> Yeah, you're right. Not being able to make system calls / launch
> > > >>>>> apps IS a major shortcoming of AIR, at this point.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Here's an official Adobe statement, as of June:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> src:
> > > http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/webforums/forum/messageview.cfm?
> > > >>>>> catid=641&threadid=1298770&STARTPAGE=2&FTVAR_FORUMVIEWTMP=Linear
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Thank you everyone who has contributed to this thread. My name
> > > is
> > > >>>>> Rob Christensen and I'm a product manager on Adobe AIR. I'd like
> > > >>>>> to provide some clarity on this topic, but also invite you to
> > > >>>>> share additional thoughts.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> The primary reason that AIR 1.0 does not include support for
> > > >>>>> launching native applications originates from a founding design
> > > >>>>> decision/philosophy. Applications that do not depend on other
> > > >>>>> applications to be installed result in a better user experience.
> > > >>>>> Our goal with AIR has been to deliver a runtime that delivers
> > > >>>>> applications consistently across operating systems. Please note
> > > >>>>> that this doesn't mean we're right nor that we might not change
> > > >>>>> our minds on this.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> We'd like to hear what you think on this topic. It's helpful if
> > > >>>>> you can let us know what you're trying to build. The more
> > > >>>>> specific you can be, the more helpful it is to our team. Please
> > > >>>>> reply to this thread or send us a note through our feedback
> > > form.
> > > >>>>> This form will send a message directly to our development and
> > > >>>>> product management team.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Feedback for (Adobe AIR)
> > > >>>>> http://www.adobe.com/go/wish/
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> As with any design decision, there's plenty of opportunity to
> > > >>>>> debate the topic and this is something we continue to discuss
> > > >>>>> even internally. The major disadvantage is that it's much more
> > > >>>>> difficult to take advantage of existing code libraries or launch
> > > >>>>> other native applications.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> At the same time, one advantage to the current design is that
> > > >>>>> when you distribute an application, you do not need to say,
> > > "This
> > > >>>>> is a really great application, but make sure you have Microsoft
> > > >>>>> Windows (or OSX) installed as well as Microsoft Word (or
> > > >>>>> Photoshop or some other native product) to really take advantage
> > > >>>>> of this application."
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Again, we may revisit this decision in the future and as with
> > > any
> > > >>>>> 1.0, you almost always come to reconsider your initial design
> > > >>>>> goals. There are some interesting options here such as the one
> > > >>>>> discussed earlier of launching the default application for a
> > > >>>>> specific file type.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Stuartc11: It is possible to launch a web browser by the way and
> > > >>>>> some of the sample applications have code that that demonstrate
> > > >>>>> how to do this.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Thanks,
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> - Rob
> > > >>>>> Product Manager, Adobe AIR
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> -Scott
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> PS: Zinc blows holes in the ozone.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On Feb 8, 2008 5:41 AM, Cedric Muller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >>>>> Actually, I was able to launch VLC with Zinc (not Zinc specific,
> > > >>>>> but
> > > >>>>> it does manage activex) and pass the HD streams to VLC
> > > >>>>> now, I am looking at a splitted screen with 4 HD streams, all
> > > >>>>> totally
> > > >>>>> fluid.
> > > >>>>> Ok ok, I have a tough graphic card, but my tests so far indicate
> > > >>>>> that
> > > >>>>> there is plenty of margin.
> > > >>>>> Moreover, with VLC I can load in almost any video type (even
> > > >>>>> FLVs)...
> > > >>>>> though i am doing an internal check, and if video is FLV I
> > > >>>>> stream it
> > > >>>>> with Flash...
> > > >>>>> The app I am building is quite technical, and clients'
> > > constraints
> > > >>>>> are very high (regarding HD (and full hd) Streaming). To be
> > > >>>>> honest,
> > > >>>>> it isn't a desktop application, more like a 'computer app'
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Cedric
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Not to be obtuse, but can you stream HD video with Zinc?
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Does streaming HD video establish the validity of a desktop
> > > app?
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Anyhow, you can stream video with Flash Media Server to the
> > > flash
> > > >>>>>> player (AIR). Probably Red5 too. Right?
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On Feb 8, 2008 2:02 AM, Cedric Muller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >>>>>> yes works well, but quite not a true desktop app: how would you
> > > >>>>>> stream Full HD video with AIR ?
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> yeah, and just to be the rah rah boy - AIR rocks.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> fine, shoot me, but it *works* well
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On Feb 7, 2008 7:33 PM, Arnoud Bos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>> Try screenweaver haxe  (swhx) if you are not afraid of
> > > >>>>> command line
> > > >>>>>>> tools.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Works great!
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> And it's opensource (this is an open source list, right?)
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Arnoud
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:osflash-
> > > >>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens bean tickler
> > > >>>>>>> Verzonden: donderdag 7 februari 2008 23:25
> > > >>>>>>> Aan: osflash@osflash.org
> > > >>>>>>> Onderwerp: [osflash] MDM Zinc v3 rant
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Sad sad sad.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Too long have I and almost everyone I know suffered with this
> > > >>>>> poor
> > > >>>>>>> product and its predecessors. 2.5 buggy buggy buggy. V3 beta,
> > > >>>>> buggy
> > > >>>>>>> but fine, BETA. V3 RELEASE, same as BETA, not one bug fixed
> > > from
> > > >>>>>>> what I can tell and they have ditched tons of the
> > > functionality
> > > >>>>>>> they had in 2.5!!!
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Why oh why do we bother??? Well, at one point they were the
> > > >>>>> best of
> > > >>>>>>> a bad bunch with shed loads of commands and slick marketing.
> > > >>>>>>> However, I feel the competitors have overtaken them. Just
> > > >>>>> look at
> > > >>>>>>> the likes of Janus (a new but reliable tool) and SWF studio.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> For me I would have loved to have stayed with SWF Studio but
> > > >>>>> they
> > > >>>>>>> had no handheld or Mac output. Janus is my new favorite as it
> > > >>>>> has
> > > >>>>>>> yet to cause me an embarrassing client crash and has Mac and
> > > >>>>> Linux
> > > >>>>>>> output coming up). But wow, I feel soo dumb for ever buying
> > > >>>>> Zinc!!
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Every negative post on their "community" forum gets deleted,
> > > >>>>> they
> > > >>>>>>> are now even checking posts _before_ they go live.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Sorry for the rant. But guessing this post wont be deleted!!!
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> > > >>>>>>> osflash mailing list
> > > >>>>>>> osflash@osflash.org
> > > >>>>>>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> --
> > > >>>>>>> [  JPG  ]
> > > >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> > > >>>>>>> osflash mailing list
> > > >>>>>>> osflash@osflash.org
> > > >>>>>>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> > > >>>>>> osflash mailing list
> > > >>>>>> osflash@osflash.org
> > > >>>>>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> --
> > > >>>>>> : : ) Scott
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Helping your grandma on the interweb
> > > >>>>>> at: http://blog.criticalpile.com
> > > >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> > > >>>>>> osflash mailing list
> > > >>>>>> osflash@osflash.org
> > > >>>>>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> _______________________________________________
> > > >>>>> osflash mailing list
> > > >>>>> osflash@osflash.org
> > > >>>>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> --
> > > >>>>> : : ) Scott
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Helping your grandma on the interweb
> > > >>>>> at: http://blog.criticalpile.com
> > > >>>>> _______________________________________________
> > > >>>>> osflash mailing list
> > > >>>>> osflash@osflash.org
> > > >>>>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> _______________________________________________
> > > >>>> osflash mailing list
> > > >>>> osflash@osflash.org
> > > >>>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> _______________________________________________
> > > >>>> osflash mailing list
> > > >>>> osflash@osflash.org
> > > >>>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> _______________________________________________
> > > >>> osflash mailing list
> > > >>> osflash@osflash.org
> > > >>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> _______________________________________________
> > > >>> osflash mailing list
> > > >>> osflash@osflash.org
> > > >>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > >> osflash mailing list
> > > >> osflash@osflash.org
> > > >> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > osflash mailing list
> > > > osflash@osflash.org
> > > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > osflash mailing list
> > > osflash@osflash.org
> > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> > >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> osflash mailing list
> osflash@osflash.org
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
>
>


-- 
: : ) Scott

Helping your grandma on the interweb
at: http://blog.criticalpile.com
_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
osflash@osflash.org
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org

Reply via email to