Robert Osfield wrote: I feel for your situation. I'm not very fond of getting torn between coding and the other side of business. I'd much rather code.
> As J.S. mentions a number of engineers have commit rights on the > branches to help out with convergance towards and maintenance of > release branches. However, only Paul Martz has really contributed > significantly in that area, with Paul managing all the work required > for the 2.6.1 stable release. I haven't had any assistance on the > other stable releases though, so while others have commit access, it's > a pretty dormant right. In the end I'm still the one pushing stable > releases and doing the bulk their maintenance, if I wasn't doing it it > does look like it would rarely get done. Well, the question still stands -- do you want to pursue a more distributed code submission review, acceptance and commit process, even if you are aiming to reduce your own work overcommit? -- Chris 'Xenon' Hanson, omo sanza lettere Xenon AlphaPixel.com PixelSense Landsat processing now available! http://www.alphapixel.com/demos/ "There is no Truth. There is only Perception. To Perceive is to Exist." - Xen _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
