PhoenixBF wrote: > > Just a question: > are there significant differences in performance on the long run / scaling up > to complex models > when using the composite viewer approach (compositeviewerexample) rather than > view config (viewconfigexample) or basic viewerexample? > > Bruno Fanini > > 3D Graphics, Natural Interaction Developer & Digital Artist >
Hi Bruno, I had not profiled the application before, but your post made me curious. I downloaded the Qijang city mode which is quite large (http://openscenegraph.org/downloads/3rdParty-Data/Qjiang/qjiang.ive) and tested running the application with gDebugger in profiling mode and recorded the following metrics: [Image: http://i.imgur.com/fSwrqmJ.png ] http://i.imgur.com/fSwrqmJ.png [Image: http://i.imgur.com/nlyqj1U.png ] http://i.imgur.com/nlyqj1U.png [Image: http://i.imgur.com/4QIYwC7.png ] http://i.imgur.com/4QIYwC7.png This shows very little difference in performance. Looking at the pure OpenGL between the different examples, then ViewerExample and ViewConfigExample is pretty much identical. CompositeViewer does some more calls, but that does not seem to affect performance. Best regards Björn ------------------ Read this topic online here: http://forum.openscenegraph.org/viewtopic.php?p=63009#63009 _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
