Thanks for all the sharing and ideas. Where I am with our case now is that I will probably not make such a big thing about the sharing of reports from the first occasion. It will be posted somewhere if anyone is interested. I will also check with my sponsors after the first 2-day OST, what they think is the best way. In each of the 2-day conferences we will devote the last half day to action planning, the re-opening style (create the agenda and then two short sessions to make the action plans). Here I think there needs to be some integration, not to start parallel groups, working on the same idea.
The first conference will probably result in a number of action plans (what? who? when? and each action plan having one person responsible to coordinate/communicate etc). So, when we go to action planning in the second conference we will already have some action plans from the first 2 day conference. In my thinking so far, I have come up with two alternatives which I am not 100% happy with. 1. Have complete documentation from the 1st OST ready, including the action plans. So, when the agenda for action planning is set I invite people to have a look at what their colleagues achieved and think about if you want to integrate your action plan with one of those from the previous OST. 2. Have the action plans from the 1st OST on a wall, present them very brief, inviting anyone to continue working on any one of them or to bring a different action up, a new one. What do you think? Any other ideas? Cheers Thomas (just arrived in Oslo - OST training Mo-Wed!) 16 aug 2013 kl. 09:23 skrev Michael M Pannwitz <mmpannw...@gmail.com>: > ...even though he might never have heard of OST, this is how Ricardo Semler > does his outfit in Brazil as reported on in his books "Maverick" and "The > Seven-Day Weekend" (I see these books in English and Italian and Spanish on > Amazon) > ...and as done by Hans-Georg Wicke who has extensively worked with OST for 13 > years in his outfit in Germany, as reported in an article that has appeared > in an ebook (this book contains the report in three languages, German, > English and Polish...a second addition with more languages added - French, > Spanisch, Chinese - is in the making...available here directly at the > publisher >> http://www.westkreuz-verlag.de/de/Jugend-fuer-Europa-E-Book > or here at amazon >> http://www.amazon.de/Jugend-Europa-Jahre-Praxis-ebook/dp/B00CDU67H0/ref=sr_1_2?s=digital-text&ie=UTF8&qid=1376636746&sr=1-2&keywords=Jugend+f%C3%BCr+Europa > > As far as documentation is concerned in OST events in sequence, I would > generally also suggest to start "clean"... but most important, I think, I > would have the sponsor/client and his Planning Group mull over this and think > up something that best fits their purpose... > On a more broader level, I think documentation of the breakout sessions is > highly overrated... If the sponsor/client is interested in action planning > and action itself that is initiated and pushed by the conveners of action (as > described in your mail) documentation might be more important... it does > require a three day event with a really diverse group (in a hospital this > would include the patients, among others) to come up with robust, sustainable > etc. action.. > But again, let the folks running their enterprise decide... I get the > impression I and some others in this trade, concern ourselves far too much > with matters which are the sponsor's/client's business. > In the first order I am not an OD consultant or consultant of whatever color > (I am good at that and it gets into my way all the time) but a sort of midman > standing back, letting the forces of selforganisation do their stuff. > > Greetings from Berlin where I am spending increasing chunks of my days in > minding the blackberries in our garden > > mmp > > > On 16.08.2013 00:08, Kári Gunnarsson wrote: >> I have also done 2 open spaces (both 3 day, one afther another), for a >> multinational assosiation of youth organizations. We tryed to i plememt >> some notion on building on the work from the other groups. To day I >> would not choose to do it that way, I think that I should rather put my >> trust in the passion of the people that are present, and start clean >> with the purpuse of the space. Then we can put it all in one document >> and invite people to form formal planing and action groups with support >> from management ( like to use the meeting rooms and take time from other >> work within limits ). One of my clients likes to think about the >> aftherwork as projects, and then give these projects funing to rent the >> them selfes from the departments management, then it is up to the team >> to sell there idea and get the funding wherever, whenever. >> >> >> >> -- >> Kári Gunnarsson >> kari.gunnars...@simnet.is <mailto:kari.gunnars...@simnet.is> >> gsm: +354 8645189 >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OSList mailing list >> To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org >> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below: >> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org >> > > -- > Michael M Pannwitz > Draisweg 1, 12209 Berlin, Germany > ++49 - 30-772 8000 > > > > Check out the Open Space World Map presently showing 412 resident Open Space > Workers in 72 countries working in a total of 143 countries worldwide: > www.openspaceworldmap.org > _______________________________________________ > OSList mailing list > To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org > To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org > To subscribe or manage your subscription click below: > http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org _______________________________________________ OSList mailing list To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org To subscribe or manage your subscription click below: http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
