Chris, So it sounds to me as though you are saying something like the framing of purpose and the tying together of harvest (to build on what Jeff said) are what help all the micro conversations to contribute usefully to the necessary diversity of ways of thinking that create oblique views in order to be able to address complex problems effectively. Is that accurate?
John On Jan 28, 2015, at 8:47 AM, Chris Corrigan via OSList wrote: > You can get a lot of work done with two or three people diving into a topic > together even while there are three or four similar topics being addressed. > > Dealing with complex issues requires taking an oblique view of a problem and > coming at it from different angles. It is really good strategy to do this. 60 > topics for 70 people could be excellent > > What matters is your strategic architecture for following up. What is the > purpose of these micro conversations and what will you do tho them. Perhaps > having THAT clarity helps people relax with the volume of topics. > > Chris > > -- > CHRIS CORRIGAN > Harvest Moon Consultants > Facilitation, Open Space Technology and process design > > Check www.chriscorrigan.com for upcoming workshops, blog posts and free > resources. > > > >> On Jan 27, 2015, at 9:51 PM, NigelSeys-Phillips via OSList >> <oslist@lists.openspacetech.org> wrote: >> >> Michael >> >> I have been actively wondering about this recently and after a really >> interesting OS two weeks ago with a local bank I appreciate for your >> thoughts >> In a couple of recent events - with the "issues and opportunities" in the >> title and the invitation to raise any issues or topics the participants feel >> strongly about - I have found myself (well, with assistance) almost 'forced' >> to combine as mathematically there were just too many! >> With three sessions available and some 70 people we were well above the 60 >> odd issues....20 plus breakout groups per session....? >> >> I know, I know - stand back and let them sort it out...but with 'new' groups >> and a day what have others done? >> My fear is allocating every single topic a breakout space and 20+ groups per >> session the fragmented nature would mean limited results.... >> >> I know, I know - stand back and trust the system. >> I am trying (I totally do trust the system which is what I love about it) >> but it's hard >> >> And I really would welcome anybody's thoughts - what do I do next time? >> >> Best regards from a hot and steamy Malaysia >> >> Nigel >> >> Nigel Seys-Phillips >> Fulcrum Business Management Solutions >> Tel: +65 9639 2510 >> E-mail: ni...@fulcrum.com.sg >> www.fulcrum.com.sg >> >> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE >> >> This communication contains information which is confidential and may also >> be priveleged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If >> you are not the intended recipient(s) please note that any distribution, >> copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly >> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify >> us by return e-mail and then delete the e-mail and any copies of it. >> >> Warning - Although Fulcrum has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no >> viruses are present in this e-mail, we cannot accept responsibility for any >> loss or damage arising from the use of this e-mail or its attachments. >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: OSList [mailto:oslist-boun...@lists.openspacetech.org] On Behalf Of >> Michael M Pannwitz via OSList >> Sent: Tuesday, 27 January 2015 6:55 PM >> To: Susan Partnow; World wide Open Space Technology email list >> Subject: Re: [OSList] Anticipating number of topics/sessions... >> >> Dear Susan, >> >> yes, thats my feeling too, 15 to 20 breakout spaces for 30 to 40 issues. >> >> Jeffs response on "combining or abandoning" topics got me to reflect on >> the word "topic". From work wayback with structured brainstorming I >> remember a group of 25 "generating" between 30 to 50 topics. >> >> With os crowds and my use of the word "issue" (with talking a bit about >> what is meant with "issue" in contrast to "topic or idea or something I >> am interested in", mentioning passion, urgency etc.) I find that there >> was decreasing tendency of combining or abolishing. Actually, when >> someone suggested to combine issues I would suggest in a very low-key >> way that this was not illegal and add something like: What might look >> and sound very similar often turns out to be different in an important way. >> >> As a participant I have become quite uncomfortable, irritated or even >> foaming when I had a facilitator go to the Bulleting Board and "cluster" >> stuff... turning into a space invador. My reaction, I suppose, got me to >> be cautious with "combining". >> >> How is your take on the impact of the "words" we use? >> >> >> Cheers and good luck with a very short event! >> >> mmp >> >>> On 26.01.2015 22:59, Susan Partnow via OSList wrote: >>> Hello dear OSers... I am planning a very short OS here in Seattle at the >>> WOW (Women of Wisdom) conference - Sunday afternoon, Feb 15 - and trying >>> to call the rule of thumb for anticipating the likely number of sessions >>> to plan for - We have two brief OS times and expect ~100 participants. >>> Any educated guesses as we plan for delineating break out spaces? Thanks! >>> >>> -- >>> Susan Partnow >>> Sr. Certified Facilitator, Compassionate Listening >>> Founding Director, Global Citizen Journey >>> 4425 Baker Ave NW >>> Seattle, WA 98107 >>> tel. 206-783-8561 >>> fax 206-782-7786 >>> www.globalcitizenjourney.org <http://www.globalcitizenjourney.org> >>> Join our mailing list >>> >>> www.susanpartnow.com <http://www.susanpartnow.com> Partnow >>> Communications, Organizational Development & Workshops >>> >>> www.conversationcafe.org <http://www.conversationcafe.org> Co-Founder >>> www.compassionatelistening.org <http://www.compassionatelistening.org> >>> Certified Facilitator and Core Council >>> www.thataway.org <http://www.thataway.org> National Coalition on >>> Dialogue & Deliberation Advisor >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OSList mailing list >>> To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org >>> To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org >>> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below: >>> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org >> >> -- >> Michael M Pannwitz >> Draisweg 1, 12209 Berlin, Germany >> ++49 - 30-772 8000 >> >> >> >> Check out the Open Space World Map presently showing 403 resident Open >> Space Workers in 69 countries working in a total of 143 countries >> worldwide: www.openspaceworldmap.org >> _______________________________________________ >> OSList mailing list >> To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org >> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below: >> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OSList mailing list >> To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org >> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below: >> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org > _______________________________________________ > OSList mailing list > To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org > To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org > To subscribe or manage your subscription click below: > http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org _______________________________________________ OSList mailing list To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org To subscribe or manage your subscription click below: http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org .
