Hi Daniel, The writing you shared may well challenge some of our assumptions -- the word "structure" is at least as loaded in our culture as the word "power" or the word "leader" -- yet it does not, to my mind, challenge our practice of OST.
Indeed, one of the great things about OST is that it's really clear how to be involved... you go up to the marketplace, announce your session, and post it. That is a very clear and explicit way of being involved, in my book... Now, when we extrapolate from OST gatherings, to talking about how organizations could or should, be structured or unstructured... that's a whole other ball of wax. I can't find the references right now, but there are a few other authors who also write very clearly and eloquently about the same phenomenon that is described in the Tyranny of Structurelessness. One is the pagan eco-activist organizer and writer Starhawk. She has worked for eons as part of radical social change activist groups who strive to be egalitarian, etc., so reading her thoughts about the inevitability of informal power arrangements arising in groups, and what to do about it, including clear and simple and helpful structures can help minimize it, was hugely valuable for me. Basically what she says is that people are always developing informal power hierarchies, based on charisma, or looks, or previous friendships, etc.... and that some of the best ways of working with that, include a) making it something that can be acknowledged and explored, rather than it being an "undiscussable" because we are "supposed to be an egalitaran group".... and b) to offer clear ways for people to contribute, so that it's clear and explicit, how people can become more involved, and thus gain greater social currency in constructive ways. (I am majorly paraphrasing here, with a quite rusty memory, so please don't take any of this too literally.) Sorry I can't give you references at the moment... my library is spread out over a few different households at present. But thank you for your own fearlessness in raising this topic. with all best wishes, Rosa *Rosa Zubizarreta* *Developing Participatory and Co-intelligent LeadershipAuthor of From Conflict to Creative Collaboration <http://www.conflict2creativity.com>* *For more resources and learning opportunities, visit**www.DiaPraxis.com <http://www.DiaPraxis.com>* On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Daniel Mezick via OSList < [email protected]> wrote: > Greeting Marie, Anna, Dirk, Michael, Rosa, JL, Harrison (...did I miss > anyone? sorry of I did) ... > > <DISCLAMER> I do like this essay. A lot. </DISCLAMER> > > Thanks for interacting around this provocative essay "The Tyranny of > Structurelessness." > > The essay certainly does challenge some of our most cherished assumptions, > doesn't it? > > The essay is issuing a clear and specific warning about tyranny developing > in groups that value "structurelessness." > > I hold this as a (current) belief, about healthy groups: > *"For everyone to have the opportunity to be involved in a given group and > to participate in its activities, the structure must be explicit, not > implicit. **"* > > > > Reiterating some of the key assertions (provocations?) in the essay, "The > Tyranny of Structurelessness"... > > ....for a moment, let's pretend the following assertions by the author are > true. > > Assuming these assertions **are** true, what are some of the implications ? > > > > - Contrary to what we would like to believe, there is no such thing as > a structureless group. > > > > - This means that to strive for a structureless group is as useful, > and as deceptive, as to aim at an "objective" news story, "value-free" > social science, or a "free" economy. A "laissez faire" group is about as > realistic as a "laissez faire" society; the idea becomes a smokescreen for > the strong or the lucky to establish unquestioned hegemony over others. > > > > - This hegemony can be so easily established because the idea of > "structurelessness" does not prevent the formation of informal structures, > only formal ones. > > > > - For everyone to have the opportunity to be involved in a given group > and to participate in its activities, the structure must be explicit, not > implicit. > > > > - It is this informal structure, particularly in Unstructured groups, > which forms the basis for elites. > > > > > > On 10/5/15 12:38 PM, Marie Nelson via OSList wrote: > > Interesting array of perspectives on structures. I sometimes distinguish > between content structures (agendas, syllabi that function for command and > control) and process structures (that liberate people/learners to interact at > the point of choice). > > Marie > > > > > > ________________________________ > From: OSList <[email protected]> > <[email protected]> on behalf of via OSList > <[email protected]> <[email protected]> > Sent: Sunday, October 4, 2015 10:27 AM > To: Harrison Owen; World wide Open Space Technology email list > Subject: Re: [OSList] The Tyranny of Structurelessness > > Dear Daniel, thank you for sharing the synopsis of the essay. Sounds very > valuable to me! > > Rosa, yes I am also a 'green' lover - but living with the assumption that I > am pretty aware of the shadows... > > For me sitting in a circle is a structure. Starting with a break is another > element of structure. Allowing participants to co-create the agenda is a > structure. Etc. > > Harrison, I don't understand why you say structure is only a figment of our > imagination. > > I believe structure is something very real - even if it's not always as > tangible as the structure of a house - how we structure time, decision > making, dialogue, sharing, connecting ... Coffee breaks, all pretty real > stuff to me. > > I believe nobody is obliged to follow a given structure. But structure - if > it's purposefully designed can enable people to enter into a state of flow > with ease and joy. > > Of course structure is not the only reason why we experience flow, joy and > ease in a meeting. > > Let's take the example of a tomato. The wooden structure that holds the > tomato is not determining how the tomato grows, but if purposefully placed > it can supports the tomato to grow. > > The tomato's purpose is not to follow the wooden structure, the tomato is > growing, and the structure is an invitation to support the growth and > development. The structure itself is not the flow. The structure can enable > flow and healthy growth. > > I think there are several structural factors that can increase joy, ease and > creativity to emerge. I'll name those that come to mind - inspired by the > 'Deep Essence Tool' of the Genuine Contact program. Let me list those factors > as questions that help me when I design meeting structures/ processes I > facilitate: > > - is the purpose of the meeting/process clear? > - what are our values? Is the design of the meeting aligned with these values? > - what assumptions do I and my clients have? (Watch out - assumptions have a > uber impact on the structure) I, you, a group, a leader have to be super > clear and honest about our assumptions - huge shadow trap - not being clear > honest about our assumptions when we create structure. > Now let's find and create a structure for our meeting, for our organization, > our movement... > The more purpose, values, assumptions and structures are aligned, in order to > create a life nurturing environment, the more the people have the opportunity > to take leadership for inspired action. > Step by step a story unfolds that is characterized by people experimenting, > sharing, trying, daring, learning ... Taking responsibility and leadership. > > Depending on my abilities, resources and assumptions, and > consciousness/awareness I create structures as a facilitator. My wish is to > design and facilitate meetings where people connect with their passion and > take leadership. My aim is to be very clear why I create which structures and > I do my best to stay open to learn from the group and adopt the structure to > their needs if needed. > > I believe the purpose of the structure is to serve people, life and flow. > Structure shall never be created in order to be obeyed by the people. But it > may enable and empower people to step into their full potential and life > force. > > We as OST community create a structure that continues to allow flow, > learning, sharing, seeping our understanding: an international email list, > language specific lists, wosonos, Stammtisch, Facebook group, online calls... > > I am grateful that this structure exists otherwise I could not learn from all > your perspectives, insights, questions and sharing. > > much Love > Anna Caroline > > > > On 03 Oct 2015, at 20:40, Harrison Owen via OSList > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > <[email protected]>> wrote: > > And just to churn the pot a bit.... open some space??? An off thought which > has pestered me recently. Goes like this. "Structure is only a figment of our > imagination. It is our "take" of reality, a flash frame of the passing scene. > In our minds it looks solid, even unchanging. But actually it is just a > momentary view of the ongoing flow." Or something. > > Harrison > > From: OSList [mailto:[email protected] > <[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Daniel Mezick via > OSList > Sent: Saturday, October 03, 2015 9:26 AM > To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > <[email protected]> > Subject: [OSList] The Tyranny of Structurelessness > > THE TYRANNY of STRUCTURELESSNESS > by Jo Freeman aka Joreen > > I find this essay extremely interesting. I hope you do, too. > > > > Here is a pertinent quote, from the essay: > "...the idea of "structurelessness" does not prevent the formation of > informal structures, only formal ones." > > > Circa 1970. Context: the women's movement. Quick summary of the main points: > from the essay... > > * During the years in which the women's liberation movement has been > taking shape, a great emphasis has been placed on what are called leaderless, > structureless groups as the main -- if not sole -- organizational form of the > movement. > > * The idea of "structurelessness," however, has moved from a healthy > counter to those tendencies, to becoming a goddess in its own right. > > * Contrary to what we would like to believe, there is no such thing as a > structureless group. > > * This means that to strive for a structureless group is as useful, and > as deceptive, as to aim at an "objective" news story, "value-free" social > science, or a "free" economy. A "laissez faire" group is about as realistic > as a "laissez faire" society; the idea becomes a smokescreen for the strong > or the lucky to establish unquestioned hegemony over others. > > * This hegemony can be so easily established because the idea of > "structurelessness" does not prevent the formation of informal structures, > only formal ones. > > * For everyone to have the opportunity to be involved in a given group > and to participate in its activities, the structure must be explicit, not > implicit. > > * It is this informal structure, particularly in Unstructured groups, > which forms the basis for elites. > > > Just in case you have not yet encountered the full text of this essay, here > it is: > > THE TYRANNY of STRUCTURELESSNESS > by Jo Freeman aka Joreenhttp://www.jofreeman.com/joreen/tyranny.htm > > > > Regards, > Danielhttp://www.OpenSpaceAgility.com/abouthttp://www.DanielMezick.com203 915 > 7248 > _______________________________________________ > OSList mailing list > To post send emails to > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > <[email protected]> > To unsubscribe send an email to > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > <[email protected]> > To subscribe or manage your subscription click > below:http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org > Past archives can be viewed here: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] > _______________________________________________ > OSList mailing list > To post send emails to [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > To subscribe or manage your subscription click > below:http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org > Past archives can be viewed here: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] > > > -- > > Daniel Mezick, President > > New Technology Solutions Inc. > > (203) 915 7248 (cell) > > Bio <http://newtechusa.net/dan-mezick/>. Blog > <http://newtechusa.net/blog/>. Twitter > <http://twitter.com/#%21/danmezick/>. > > Examine my new book: The Culture Game > <http://newtechusa.net/about/the-culture-game-book/>: Tools for the Agile > Manager. > > Explore Agile Team Training > <http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-training/> and Coaching. > <http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-coaching/> > > Explore the Agile Boston <http://newtechusa.net//user-groups/ma/> > Community. > > _______________________________________________ > OSList mailing list > To post send emails to [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > To subscribe or manage your subscription click below: > http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org > Past archives can be viewed here: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] >
_______________________________________________ OSList mailing list To post send emails to [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] To subscribe or manage your subscription click below: http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org Past archives can be viewed here: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
