Greeting Marie, Anna, Dirk, Michael, Rosa, JL, Harrison (...did I miss
anyone? sorry of I did) ...
<DISCLAMER> I do like this essay. A lot. </DISCLAMER>
Thanks for interacting around this provocative essay "The Tyranny of
Structurelessness."
The essay certainly does challenge some of our most cherished
assumptions, doesn't it?
The essay is issuing a clear and specific warning about tyranny
developing in groups that value "structurelessness."
I hold this as a (current) belief, about healthy groups:
/"For everyone to have the opportunity to be involved in a given group
and to participate in its activities, the structure must be explicit,
not implicit. //"/
Reiterating some of the key assertions (provocations?) in the essay,
"The Tyranny of Structurelessness"...
....for a moment, let's pretend the following assertions by the author
are true.
Assuming these assertions **are** true, what are some of the implications ?
* Contrary to what we would like to believe, there is no such thing as
a structureless group.
* This means that to strive for a structureless group is as useful,
and as deceptive, as to aim at an "objective" news story,
"value-free" social science, or a "free" economy. A "laissez faire"
group is about as realistic as a "laissez faire" society; the idea
becomes a smokescreen for the strong or the lucky to establish
unquestioned hegemony over others.
* This hegemony can be so easily established because the idea of
"structurelessness" does not prevent the formation of informal
structures, only formal ones.
* For everyone to have the opportunity to be involved in a given group
and to participate in its activities, the structure must be
explicit, not implicit.
* It is this informal structure, particularly in Unstructured groups,
which forms the basis for elites.
On 10/5/15 12:38 PM, Marie Nelson via OSList wrote:
Interesting array of perspectives on structures. I sometimes distinguish
between content structures (agendas, syllabi that function for command and
control) and process structures (that liberate people/learners to interact at
the point of choice).
Marie
________________________________
From: OSList <[email protected]> on behalf of via OSList
<[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 4, 2015 10:27 AM
To: Harrison Owen; World wide Open Space Technology email list
Subject: Re: [OSList] The Tyranny of Structurelessness
Dear Daniel, thank you for sharing the synopsis of the essay. Sounds very
valuable to me!
Rosa, yes I am also a 'green' lover - but living with the assumption that I am
pretty aware of the shadows...
For me sitting in a circle is a structure. Starting with a break is another
element of structure. Allowing participants to co-create the agenda is a
structure. Etc.
Harrison, I don't understand why you say structure is only a figment of our
imagination.
I believe structure is something very real - even if it's not always as
tangible as the structure of a house - how we structure time, decision making,
dialogue, sharing, connecting ... Coffee breaks, all pretty real stuff to me.
I believe nobody is obliged to follow a given structure. But structure - if
it's purposefully designed can enable people to enter into a state of flow with
ease and joy.
Of course structure is not the only reason why we experience flow, joy and ease
in a meeting.
Let's take the example of a tomato. The wooden structure that holds the tomato
is not determining how the tomato grows, but if purposefully placed it can
supports the tomato to grow.
The tomato's purpose is not to follow the wooden structure, the tomato is
growing, and the structure is an invitation to support the growth and
development. The structure itself is not the flow. The structure can enable
flow and healthy growth.
I think there are several structural factors that can increase joy, ease and
creativity to emerge. I'll name those that come to mind - inspired by the
'Deep Essence Tool' of the Genuine Contact program. Let me list those factors
as questions that help me when I design meeting structures/ processes I
facilitate:
- is the purpose of the meeting/process clear?
- what are our values? Is the design of the meeting aligned with these values?
- what assumptions do I and my clients have? (Watch out - assumptions have a
uber impact on the structure) I, you, a group, a leader have to be super clear
and honest about our assumptions - huge shadow trap - not being clear honest
about our assumptions when we create structure.
Now let's find and create a structure for our meeting, for our organization,
our movement...
The more purpose, values, assumptions and structures are aligned, in order to
create a life nurturing environment, the more the people have the opportunity
to take leadership for inspired action.
Step by step a story unfolds that is characterized by people experimenting,
sharing, trying, daring, learning ... Taking responsibility and leadership.
Depending on my abilities, resources and assumptions, and
consciousness/awareness I create structures as a facilitator. My wish is to
design and facilitate meetings where people connect with their passion and take
leadership. My aim is to be very clear why I create which structures and I do
my best to stay open to learn from the group and adopt the structure to their
needs if needed.
I believe the purpose of the structure is to serve people, life and flow.
Structure shall never be created in order to be obeyed by the people. But it
may enable and empower people to step into their full potential and life force.
We as OST community create a structure that continues to allow flow, learning,
sharing, seeping our understanding: an international email list, language
specific lists, wosonos, Stammtisch, Facebook group, online calls...
I am grateful that this structure exists otherwise I could not learn from all
your perspectives, insights, questions and sharing.
much Love
Anna Caroline
On 03 Oct 2015, at 20:40, Harrison Owen via OSList
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
And just to churn the pot a bit.... open some space??? An off thought which has pestered me
recently. Goes like this. "Structure is only a figment of our imagination. It is our
"take" of reality, a flash frame of the passing scene. In our minds it looks solid, even
unchanging. But actually it is just a momentary view of the ongoing flow." Or something.
Harrison
From: OSList [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Daniel Mezick via OSList
Sent: Saturday, October 03, 2015 9:26 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [OSList] The Tyranny of Structurelessness
THE TYRANNY of STRUCTURELESSNESS
by Jo Freeman aka Joreen
I find this essay extremely interesting. I hope you do, too.
Here is a pertinent quote, from the essay:
"...the idea of "structurelessness" does not prevent the formation of informal
structures, only formal ones."
Circa 1970. Context: the women's movement. Quick summary of the main points:
from the essay...
* During the years in which the women's liberation movement has been
taking shape, a great emphasis has been placed on what are called leaderless,
structureless groups as the main -- if not sole -- organizational form of the
movement.
* The idea of "structurelessness," however, has moved from a healthy
counter to those tendencies, to becoming a goddess in its own right.
* Contrary to what we would like to believe, there is no such thing as a
structureless group.
* This means that to strive for a structureless group is as useful, and as deceptive, as to aim at an "objective"
news story, "value-free" social science, or a "free" economy. A "laissez faire" group is about as
realistic as a "laissez faire" society; the idea becomes a smokescreen for the strong or the lucky to establish
unquestioned hegemony over others.
* This hegemony can be so easily established because the idea of
"structurelessness" does not prevent the formation of informal structures, only
formal ones.
* For everyone to have the opportunity to be involved in a given group and
to participate in its activities, the structure must be explicit, not implicit.
* It is this informal structure, particularly in Unstructured groups,
which forms the basis for elites.
Just in case you have not yet encountered the full text of this essay, here it
is:
THE TYRANNY of STRUCTURELESSNESS
by Jo Freeman aka Joreen
http://www.jofreeman.com/joreen/tyranny.htm
Regards,
Daniel
http://www.OpenSpaceAgility.com/about
http://www.DanielMezick.com
203 915 7248
_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
To unsubscribe send an email to
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
Past archives can be viewed here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
Past archives can be viewed here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
--
Daniel Mezick, President
New Technology Solutions Inc.
(203) 915 7248 (cell)
Bio <http://newtechusa.net/dan-mezick/>. Blog
<http://newtechusa.net/blog/>. Twitter <http://twitter.com/#%21/danmezick/>.
Examine my new book:The Culture Game
<http://newtechusa.net/about/the-culture-game-book/>: Tools for the
Agile Manager.
Explore Agile Team Training
<http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-training/> and Coaching.
<http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-coaching/>
Explore the Agile Boston <http://newtechusa.net//user-groups/ma/>Community.
_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
Past archives can be viewed here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
