Hi Daniel,
The writing you shared may well challenge some of our assumptions --
the word "structure" is at least as loaded in our culture as the word
"power" or the word "leader" -- yet it does not, to my mind, challenge
our practice of OST.
Indeed, one of the great things about OST is that it's really clear
how to be involved... you go up to the marketplace, announce your
session, and post it. That is a very clear and explicit way of being
involved, in my book...
Now, when we extrapolate from OST gatherings, to talking about how
organizations could or should, be structured or unstructured... that's
a whole other ball of wax.
I can't find the references right now, but there are a few other
authors who also write very clearly and eloquently about the same
phenomenon that is described in the Tyranny of Structurelessness. One
is the pagan eco-activist organizer and writer Starhawk. She has
worked for eons as part of radical social change activist groups who
strive to be egalitarian, etc., so reading her thoughts about the
inevitability of informal power arrangements arising in groups, and
what to do about it, including clear and simple and helpful structures
can help minimize it, was hugely valuable for me.
Basically what she says is that people are always developing informal
power hierarchies, based on charisma, or looks, or previous
friendships, etc.... and that some of the best ways of working with
that, include a) making it something that can be acknowledged and
explored, rather than it being an "undiscussable" because we are
"supposed to be an egalitaran group".... and b) to offer clear ways
for people to contribute, so that it's clear and explicit, how people
can become more involved, and thus gain greater social currency in
constructive ways. (I am majorly paraphrasing here, with a quite rusty
memory, so please don't take any of this too literally.)
Sorry I can't give you references at the moment... my library is
spread out over a few different households at present. But thank you
for your own fearlessness in raising this topic.
with all best wishes,
Rosa
/*Rosa Zubizarreta*
/
/////Developing Participatory and Co-intelligent Leadership
/Author of *From Conflict to Creative Collaboration*
<http://www.conflict2creativity.com>
/
/
/For more resources and learning opportunities, visit
//*www.DiaPraxis.com <http://www.DiaPraxis.com>*/
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Daniel Mezick via OSList
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Greeting Marie, Anna, Dirk, Michael, Rosa, JL, Harrison (...did I
miss anyone? sorry of I did) ...
<DISCLAMER> I do like this essay. A lot. </DISCLAMER>
Thanks for interacting around this provocative essay "The Tyranny
of Structurelessness."
The essay certainly does challenge some of our most cherished
assumptions, doesn't it?
The essay is issuing a clear and specific warning about tyranny
developing in groups that value "structurelessness."
I hold this as a (current) belief, about healthy groups:
/"For everyone to have the opportunity to be involved in a given
group and to participate in its activities, the structure must be
explicit, not implicit. //"/
Reiterating some of the key assertions (provocations?) in the
essay, "The Tyranny of Structurelessness"...
....for a moment, let's pretend the following assertions by the
author are true.
Assuming these assertions **are** true, what are some of the
implications ?
* Contrary to what we would like to believe, there is no such
thing as a structureless group.
* This means that to strive for a structureless group is as
useful, and as deceptive, as to aim at an "objective" news
story, "value-free" social science, or a "free" economy. A
"laissez faire" group is about as realistic as a "laissez
faire" society; the idea becomes a smokescreen for the strong
or the lucky to establish unquestioned hegemony over others.
* This hegemony can be so easily established because the idea of
"structurelessness" does not prevent the formation of informal
structures, only formal ones.
* For everyone to have the opportunity to be involved in a given
group and to participate in its activities, the structure must
be explicit, not implicit.
* It is this informal structure, particularly in Unstructured
groups, which forms the basis for elites.
On 10/5/15 12:38 PM, Marie Nelson via OSList wrote:
Interesting array of perspectives on structures. I sometimes distinguish
between content structures (agendas, syllabi that function for command and
control) and process structures (that liberate people/learners to interact at
the point of choice).
Marie
________________________________
From: OSList<[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]> on behalf of via
OSList<[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 4, 2015 10:27 AM
To: Harrison Owen; World wide Open Space Technology email list
Subject: Re: [OSList] The Tyranny of Structurelessness
Dear Daniel, thank you for sharing the synopsis of the essay. Sounds very
valuable to me!
Rosa, yes I am also a 'green' lover - but living with the assumption that I
am pretty aware of the shadows...
For me sitting in a circle is a structure. Starting with a break is another
element of structure. Allowing participants to co-create the agenda is a
structure. Etc.
Harrison, I don't understand why you say structure is only a figment of our
imagination.
I believe structure is something very real - even if it's not always as
tangible as the structure of a house - how we structure time, decision making,
dialogue, sharing, connecting ... Coffee breaks, all pretty real stuff to me.
I believe nobody is obliged to follow a given structure. But structure - if
it's purposefully designed can enable people to enter into a state of flow with
ease and joy.
Of course structure is not the only reason why we experience flow, joy and
ease in a meeting.
Let's take the example of a tomato. The wooden structure that holds the
tomato is not determining how the tomato grows, but if purposefully placed it
can supports the tomato to grow.
The tomato's purpose is not to follow the wooden structure, the tomato is
growing, and the structure is an invitation to support the growth and
development. The structure itself is not the flow. The structure can enable
flow and healthy growth.
I think there are several structural factors that can increase joy, ease
and creativity to emerge. I'll name those that come to mind - inspired by the
'Deep Essence Tool' of the Genuine Contact program. Let me list those factors
as questions that help me when I design meeting structures/ processes I
facilitate:
- is the purpose of the meeting/process clear?
- what are our values? Is the design of the meeting aligned with these
values?
- what assumptions do I and my clients have? (Watch out - assumptions have
a uber impact on the structure) I, you, a group, a leader have to be super
clear and honest about our assumptions - huge shadow trap - not being clear
honest about our assumptions when we create structure.
Now let's find and create a structure for our meeting, for our
organization, our movement...
The more purpose, values, assumptions and structures are aligned, in order
to create a life nurturing environment, the more the people have the
opportunity to take leadership for inspired action.
Step by step a story unfolds that is characterized by people experimenting,
sharing, trying, daring, learning ... Taking responsibility and leadership.
Depending on my abilities, resources and assumptions, and
consciousness/awareness I create structures as a facilitator. My wish is to
design and facilitate meetings where people connect with their passion and take
leadership. My aim is to be very clear why I create which structures and I do
my best to stay open to learn from the group and adopt the structure to their
needs if needed.
I believe the purpose of the structure is to serve people, life and flow.
Structure shall never be created in order to be obeyed by the people. But it
may enable and empower people to step into their full potential and life force.
We as OST community create a structure that continues to allow flow,
learning, sharing, seeping our understanding: an international email list,
language specific lists, wosonos, Stammtisch, Facebook group, online calls...
I am grateful that this structure exists otherwise I could not learn from
all your perspectives, insights, questions and sharing.
much Love
Anna Caroline
On 03 Oct 2015, at 20:40, Harrison Owen via OSList
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
And just to churn the pot a bit.... open some space??? An off thought which has pestered me
recently. Goes like this. "Structure is only a figment of our imagination. It is our
"take" of reality, a flash frame of the passing scene. In our minds it looks solid, even
unchanging. But actually it is just a momentary view of the ongoing flow." Or something.
Harrison
From: OSList [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Daniel Mezick via OSList
Sent: Saturday, October 03, 2015 9:26 AM
To:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [OSList] The Tyranny of Structurelessness
THE TYRANNY of STRUCTURELESSNESS
by Jo Freeman aka Joreen
I find this essay extremely interesting. I hope you do, too.
Here is a pertinent quote, from the essay:
"...the idea of "structurelessness" does not prevent the formation of informal
structures, only formal ones."
Circa 1970. Context: the women's movement. Quick summary of the main
points: from the essay...
* During the years in which the women's liberation movement has been
taking shape, a great emphasis has been placed on what are called leaderless,
structureless groups as the main -- if not sole -- organizational form of the
movement.
* The idea of "structurelessness," however, has moved from a healthy
counter to those tendencies, to becoming a goddess in its own right.
* Contrary to what we would like to believe, there is no such thing as
a structureless group.
* This means that to strive for a structureless group is as useful, and as deceptive, as to aim at an
"objective" news story, "value-free" social science, or a "free" economy. A "laissez
faire" group is about as realistic as a "laissez faire" society; the idea becomes a smokescreen for the strong or
the lucky to establish unquestioned hegemony over others.
* This hegemony can be so easily established because the idea of
"structurelessness" does not prevent the formation of informal structures, only
formal ones.
* For everyone to have the opportunity to be involved in a given group
and to participate in its activities, the structure must be explicit, not
implicit.
* It is this informal structure, particularly in Unstructured groups,
which forms the basis for elites.
Just in case you have not yet encountered the full text of this essay, here
it is:
THE TYRANNY of STRUCTURELESSNESS
by Jo Freeman aka Joreen
http://www.jofreeman.com/joreen/tyranny.htm
Regards,
Daniel
http://www.OpenSpaceAgility.com/about
http://www.DanielMezick.com
203 915 7248 <tel:203%20915%207248>
_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]>
To unsubscribe send an email [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]>
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
Past archives can be viewed
here:http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
To unsubscribe send an email [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
Past archives can be viewed
here:http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
--
Daniel Mezick, President
New Technology Solutions Inc.
(203) 915 7248 <tel:%28203%29%20915%207248> (cell)
Bio <http://newtechusa.net/dan-mezick/>. Blog
<http://newtechusa.net/blog/>. Twitter
<http://twitter.com/#%21/danmezick/>.
Examine my new book:The Culture Game
<http://newtechusa.net/about/the-culture-game-book/>: Tools for
the Agile Manager.
Explore Agile Team Training
<http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-training/> and
Coaching. <http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-coaching/>
Explore the Agile Boston
<http://newtechusa.net//user-groups/ma/>Community.
_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
To unsubscribe send an email to
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
Past archives can be viewed here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
