At 11:11 PM -0400 9/6/09, Arno Hautala wrote:
>On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 22:44, Kevin Callahan<[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> now we discover [Abu Grahib] was policy from the top down - approved
>> by the executive branch, by the oval office
>
>Yeah, you'd think if the government WAS behind 911 (pretty easily a
>bigger endeavor than covering up Abu Grahib) that conspiracy would've
>collapsed under it's own weight by now as well. I guess they managed
>to execute that one flawlessly.
Basically, if you are a believer in conspiracy theories, then
you see all the poorly executed conspiracy theories that we know
about, and assume that this must be just the tip of the iceberg, and
we only catch the dumbest 10%.
If you are a non-believer, you probably are going to see all
the conspiracy theories we that we know about because they failed,
and assume that eventual failure is the normal conspiracy theory
life-cycle, and we actually find out about most of them, and most of
them aren't that clever or important.
Personally, I am a big believer in Hanlons Razor, the idea
that you should never attribute to malice what can adequately be
explained by stupidity. Believe in the power of stupidity, it is a
might and indefeatable facet of human nature.
> > particularly of a 47 story steel building falling at essentially free-fall
>> speed that was not hit by a plane
>
>So, at what speed should a building fall once its structure has failed?
Amazing how so many people become demolition experts once it
is part of the conspiracy, isn't it?
Cheers
Dave
_______________________________________________
OSX-Nutters mailing list | [email protected]
http://lists.tit-wank.com/mailman/listinfo/osx-nutters
List hosted at http://cat5.org/
