On 27 Nov 2023, at 19:16, Ilya Maximets wrote:

> On 11/27/23 13:41, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>> I ran 80 series of full tests, and the following tests showed failures:
>
> Hi, Eelco.
>
> It looks like this patch should go before enabling the actual testing.
> Some of the previous patches in the sat failed CI because of these issues.

ACK I noticed too, will move this be one of the first patches.
>>
>>  802.1ad - vlan_limit
>>    +2023-11-20T10:32:11.245Z|00001|dpif_netdev(revalidator5)|ERR|internal
>>      error parsing flow key recirc_id(0),dp_hash(0),skb_priority(0),
>>      in_port(2),skb_mark(0),ct_state(0),ct_zone(0),ct_mark(0),ct_label(0),
>>      packet_type(ns=0,id=0),eth(src=42:7e:4b:46:68:1b,dst=33:33:ff:46:68:1b),
>>      eth_type(0x88a8),vlan(vid=4094,pcp=0),encap(eth_type(0x8100),
>>      vlan(vid=100,pcp=0),encap(eth_type(0x86dd),ipv6(
>>      src=::,dst=ff02::1:ff46:681b,label=0,proto=58,tclass=0,hlimit=255,
>>      frag=no),icmpv6(type=135,code=0),nd(target=fe80::407e:4bff:fe46:681b,
>>      sll=00:00:00:00:00:00,tll=00:00:00:00:00:00)))
>>    +2023-11-20T10:32:11.245Z|00002|dpif(revalidator5)|WARN|netdev@ovs-netdev:
>>      failed to put[modify] (Invalid argument)
>>      ufid:ef1ca90c-dbd0-4ca7-9869-411bdffd1ece recirc_id(0),dp_hash(0/0),
>>      skb_priority(0/0),in_port(2),skb_mark(0/0),ct_state(0/0),ct_zone(0/0),
>>      ct_mark(0/0),ct_label(0/0),packet_type(ns=0,id=0),
>>      eth(src=42:7e:4b:46:68:1b,dst=33:33:ff:46:68:1b),eth_type(0x88a8),
>>      vlan(vid=4094,pcp=0/0x0),encap(eth_type(0x8100),
>>      vlan(vid=100/0x0,pcp=0/0x0),encap(eth_type(0x86dd),
>>      ipv6(src=::/::,dst=ff02::1:ff46:681b/::,label=0/0,proto=58/0,
>>      tclass=0/0,hlimit=255/0,frag=no),icmpv6(type=135/0,code=0/0),
>>      nd(target=fe80::407e:4bff:fe46:681b/::,
>>      sll=00:00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00:00,
>>      tll=00:00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00:00))), actions:drop
>
> BTW, we should be able to fix this test now, since David fixed the
> revalidator pause/resume logic.

Let me take a look at the test. I am not sure how to verify as I can not make 
it fail easily.

>>
>>   conntrack - zones from other field, more tests
>>     +2023-11-20T10:45:43.015Z|00001|dpif(handler5)|WARN|system@ovs-system:
>>       execute ct(commit),3 failed (Invalid argument) on packet tcp,
>>       vlan_tci=0x0000,dl_src=42:7e:4b:46:68:1b,dl_dst=ba:72:4c:a5:31:6b,
>>       nw_src=10.1.1.1,nw_dst=10.1.1.2,nw_tos=0,nw_ecn=0,nw_ttl=64,
>>       nw_frag=no,tp_src=53738,tp_dst=80,tcp_flags=psh|ack tcp_csum:e4a
>>
>>   conntrack - limit by zone
>>     ./system-traffic.at:5154: ovs-appctl dpctl/ct-get-limits zone=0,1,2,3,4,5
>>     --- -    2023-11-20 10:51:09.965375141 +0000
>>     +++ /home/runner/work/ovs/ovs/tests/system-kmod-testsuite.dir/at-groups/
>>       114/stdout     2023-11-20 10:51:09.956723756 +0000
>>     @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>>      default limit=10
>>     -zone=0,limit=5,count=5
>>     +zone=0,limit=5,count=6
>>
>>   conntrack - Multiple ICMP traverse
>>     ./system-traffic.at:7571: ovs-appctl dpctl/dump-conntrack | grep 
>> "dst=10.1.1" | sed -e 's/port=[0-9]*/port=<cleared>/g' -e 
>> 's/id=[0-9]*/id=<cleared>/g'
>>       -e 's/state=[0-9_A-Z]*/state=<cleared>/g' | sort | uniq
>>     --- -    2023-11-20 15:36:02.591051192 +0000
>>     +++ 
>> /home/runner/work/ovs/ovs/tests/system-kmod-testsuite.dir/at-groups/156/stdout
>>        2023-11-20 15:36:02.585722099 +0000
>
> Please, try to avoid such a long lines in the commit message.
> Some can be split, some can be trimmed as most of the info in
> them is not actually useful.

ACK.

> I didn't fully review the actual code change here.

I’ll wait for some comments on the previous patch replies and send a v3.

Thanks for reviewing the series!

//Eelco

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to