On 28 Nov 2023, at 8:52, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
> On 27 Nov 2023, at 19:16, Ilya Maximets wrote: > >> On 11/27/23 13:41, Eelco Chaudron wrote: >>> I ran 80 series of full tests, and the following tests showed failures: >> >> Hi, Eelco. >> >> It looks like this patch should go before enabling the actual testing. >> Some of the previous patches in the sat failed CI because of these issues. > > ACK I noticed too, will move this be one of the first patches. >>> >>> 802.1ad - vlan_limit >>> +2023-11-20T10:32:11.245Z|00001|dpif_netdev(revalidator5)|ERR|internal >>> error parsing flow key recirc_id(0),dp_hash(0),skb_priority(0), >>> in_port(2),skb_mark(0),ct_state(0),ct_zone(0),ct_mark(0),ct_label(0), >>> >>> packet_type(ns=0,id=0),eth(src=42:7e:4b:46:68:1b,dst=33:33:ff:46:68:1b), >>> eth_type(0x88a8),vlan(vid=4094,pcp=0),encap(eth_type(0x8100), >>> vlan(vid=100,pcp=0),encap(eth_type(0x86dd),ipv6( >>> src=::,dst=ff02::1:ff46:681b,label=0,proto=58,tclass=0,hlimit=255, >>> frag=no),icmpv6(type=135,code=0),nd(target=fe80::407e:4bff:fe46:681b, >>> sll=00:00:00:00:00:00,tll=00:00:00:00:00:00))) >>> >>> +2023-11-20T10:32:11.245Z|00002|dpif(revalidator5)|WARN|netdev@ovs-netdev: >>> failed to put[modify] (Invalid argument) >>> ufid:ef1ca90c-dbd0-4ca7-9869-411bdffd1ece recirc_id(0),dp_hash(0/0), >>> skb_priority(0/0),in_port(2),skb_mark(0/0),ct_state(0/0),ct_zone(0/0), >>> ct_mark(0/0),ct_label(0/0),packet_type(ns=0,id=0), >>> eth(src=42:7e:4b:46:68:1b,dst=33:33:ff:46:68:1b),eth_type(0x88a8), >>> vlan(vid=4094,pcp=0/0x0),encap(eth_type(0x8100), >>> vlan(vid=100/0x0,pcp=0/0x0),encap(eth_type(0x86dd), >>> ipv6(src=::/::,dst=ff02::1:ff46:681b/::,label=0/0,proto=58/0, >>> tclass=0/0,hlimit=255/0,frag=no),icmpv6(type=135/0,code=0/0), >>> nd(target=fe80::407e:4bff:fe46:681b/::, >>> sll=00:00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00:00, >>> tll=00:00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00:00))), actions:drop >> >> BTW, we should be able to fix this test now, since David fixed the >> revalidator pause/resume logic. > > Let me take a look at the test. I am not sure how to verify as I can not make > it fail easily. > Looked at this, but it’s not revalidator related, it’s formatting done by the userspace part. Tried to replicate this but was not successful outside of GitHub actions. Will add this to my TODO, and revisit it later. For now will keep it excluded in this patch set. //Eelco <SNIP> _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
