Jan, Do you know how to talk to the i2c via user-space?(Something like libusb or tty system). Then a non-w1 approach would be easy. There is an example implementation for the DS2482 in the kernel; module, and the communication structure is an easy match for OWFS.
Paul On Thursday 09 March 2006 08:09 am, Jan Kandziora wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 9. März 2006 12:53 schrieb Alfille, Paul H.,M.D.: > > Jan, the only support needed would be either a sample of the hardware > > (adapter) or the willingness to test frequent test builds. > > I will definately build a board based on the DS2482-800 chip and will test > owfs improvements, too. > > > The only changes will be that the w1 polls at it's own rate rather than > > on demand, > > Hm. That's not so good. If one has a lot of chips on the bus, but only a > few of them used at the same time, synchronous polling makes thing things > damn slow. But that's exactly my use case. I could release a developer for > this in ~8..10 weeks I think, but that's too late for my current > development. > > Maybe the best idea for me is to put space for both DS2480B and DS2482-800 > on my PCB and improve later. ^^; > > > and that multiple adapters aren't yet supported by w1. > > Not that important for me, I think. > > > Also the > > alarm directory isn't yet implemented. Evgeniy is eager to improve > > function. > > I'll talk to him directly, too. > > > Kind regards > > Jan Kandziora ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Owfs-developers mailing list Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers
