On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 04:52:07PM +0100, Jan Kandziora ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Am Dienstag, 14. März 2006 09:15 schrieb Evgeniy Polyakov: > > > > > > > > > > For such applications as mine, it would be better to have more control > > > over which chips are "interesting" in some situation, and should be > > > updated more often and which are not. Maybe you (or we) can put some > > > "rating" on each chip, and an interface for the application program. > > > > > > > > > Or did I misunderstood your wohle concept? > > > > Repeated search is needed for authentification cases and ibuttons. > > It also helps to detect bad lines. > > > > Current design allows to setup w1_master_search per bus master device, > > so in case of auth checks and big number of devices it would be better > > to setup two masters for each kind of usage case.
... > That's why I came up with the idea of having an application-controlled update > scheme. The update frequency could be determined by the kernel automatically, > too - chips which are read out more often by an application are updated more > often. I can't measure the effort needed to implement this, though. w1 still allows to turn automatic updates off and turn them on on your own preferred interval or make them one-shot. > Kind regards > > Jan Kandziora > > -- > "...Deep Hack Mode -- that mysterious and frightening state of > consciousness where mortal users fear to tread. > -- Matt Welsh -- Evgeniy Polyakov ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Owfs-developers mailing list Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers