Am Dienstag, 14. März 2006 17:07 schrieb Evgeniy Polyakov:
> > That's why I came up with the idea of having an application-controlled
> > update scheme. The update frequency could be determined by the kernel
> > automatically, too - chips which are read out more often by an
> > application are updated more often. I can't measure the effort needed to
> > implement this, though.
>
> w1 still allows to turn automatic updates off and turn them on on your own
> preferred interval or make them one-shot.
>
Huh? I thought this was not possible on an one-chip basis, but only per host.
Now I'm confused. Sorry.
Kind regards
Jan Kandziora
--
Your fault: core dumped
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642
_______________________________________________
Owfs-developers mailing list
Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers
