<time waste - no real info>
Just adding my 2c:

I used to use Subversion and loved it - it did everything I wanted it to do.
One day I had some time on my hands and decided to try Mercurial, just to
see what it was like. I have never used Subversion since. 90% of my stuff is
single developer and local (when I'm on contract I use whatever the use, so
that doesn't count). Like Paul says, it's really one of those things that
you need to try to see the difference. I feel "safer" and more in control
with Mercurial, it's easier to branch and merge and overall just feels
nicer.

It's all just airy fairy stuff - this post contains no real new information.
Probably  could have just summed it up by saying +1 to Mercurial. I haven't
used TFS.
</time waste - no real info>


On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 6:30 PM, silky <michaelsli...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Paul Stovell <paul.stov...@readify.net>
> wrote:
> > > > Broken how?
>
> [...]
>
> > In Mercurial it works different. You'd pull the 19 changes made to the
> trunk to your local repository - they'd be replayed, one-by-one, against
> your
> > files. You'll still do the merges (leaving alone that Mercurial does a
> much better job of merging than TFS out of the box), but since you're
> dealing
> > with one or two commits at a time, the merges are pretty simple, and if
> you screw up, you don't have to start the whole thing again. Once you've
> > merged the trunk into your branch, you'd just push everything back to
> trunk. Now all the changes are replayed against trunk, and trunk has all 32
> > commits, with their history and dates exactly as you wrote them when you
> checked them in during the week. It's a much more elegant model.
>
> Right. (Sorry if I wasn't clear, but I haven't used TFS and was more
> interested in how you consider Subversions merge broken; I understand
> that in the system you are describing it is 'different', I don't see
> any point in calling Subversion 'broken' though).
>
>
> > Paul
>
> --
> silky
>
> http://dnoondt.wordpress.com/
>
> "Every morning when I wake up, I experience an exquisite joy — the joy
> of being this signature."
>

Reply via email to