#1 I love the new look too! Or... maybe I should say that I am not too fussed about it because for sure there are heaps of themes that let me "fix" it.
But #2 Please fix the docking. Let controls use up all space. There are at least 4 places where that would be nice... as mentioned by others: 1 Project properties 2 Tools | Options Dialog (Keyboard shows 3 lines) 3 Exception dialog in Debugger 4 Debug | Exceptions Dialog Thanks! Looking forward to use it BTW +1 to performance On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Nick Randolph <n...@builttoroam.com> wrote: > Oh the sheltered life you live. Break out of the MS bubble for a while and > watch what happens in the real world. Even some dev shops are stuck on > VS2008 in the same way as some enterprises are on WinXP.**** > > ** ** > > <rant> If you do anything related to the old Windows Mobile platform, for > example, you have to use VS2008 – and no, there are some cases where we > can’t just build a Windows Phone version. Microsoft officially screwed us > when killing Windows Mobile as there is no alternative for line of business > applications that require peripherals and/or ruggedized devices L </rant>* > *** > > ** ** > > *Nick Randolph** *| *Built to Roam Pty Ltd* | Microsoft MVP – Windows > Phone Development | +61 412 413 425 | @btroam > The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not > the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this > email in any way. Built to Roam Pty Ltd does not guarantee the integrity of > any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the > author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Built to Roam Pty > Ltd.**** > > ** ** > > *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto: > ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *David Kean > *Sent:* Friday, 24 February 2012 3:58 PM > *To:* ozDotNet > *Subject:* RE: New look of Visual Studio, what are your thoughts?**** > > ** ** > > Thanks for the feedback. On the three different versions things, why are > you using three? What you building that still requires 2005/2008?**** > > ** ** > > *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com > [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *mike smith > *Sent:* Thursday, February 23, 2012 9:35 PM > *To:* ozDotNet > *Subject:* Re: New look of Visual Studio, what are your thoughts?**** > > ** ** > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 4:15 PM, David Kean <david.k...@microsoft.com> > wrote: > > We showed off the new look today: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudio/ > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > I agree, somewhat, about the colour, but feel you've gone too far towards > monochrome. And if you make me learn a new set of damned icons, I won't > use the bloody thing. This is one thing I wish Microsoft would stop > tinkering with. Icons, menu layouts, dialog layouts. Some of us don't > move on completely from one version to another, but use 3 different > versions of VS. Do you have any idea how painful this is? > > [image: Description: Pictographic icons from VS 2010 on the top row with > the equivalent VS 11 glyphs on the bottom row] **** > > ** ** > > Take the comment/uncomment icons. WTF are they meant to represent?**** > > ** ** > > </rant>**** > > ** ** > > > > -- > Meski > > http://courteous.ly/aAOZcv > > "Going to Starbucks for coffee is like going to prison for sex. Sure, > you'll get it, but it's going to be rough" - Adam Hills**** > -- .peter.gfader. (current mood = happy!) Check this before you go live http://blog.gfader.com/2011/07/website-check-list-part-1-aspnet-4.html
<<image001.png>>
