Deployment is part of TCO, and the TCO sucks when you have lots and lots of 
thick client apps. And you can’t just say “that’s deployment” – lots of people 
have tried to solve the deployment problem, and no one has.

Web-based isn’t driven by “IT sick of deploying apps” – web based is driven by 
the people who pay the bills.
Whether that be the buyer, or the producer.  Google sees no value in writing a 
thick-client email client, and CIOs see Gmail as working just fine without one.


From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On 
Behalf Of Greg Low
Sent: Tuesday, 21 November 2017 7:26 PM
To: ozDotNet <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com>
Subject: Re: Creating a browser-based product

Again all of that is largely about deployment Ken. Yes thick client apps were a 
pain in the neck to test and deploy. But surely we could have improved the dev 
experience even further, while building something trivial to deploy. Web apps 
were largely driven by IT admin folk who were sick of trying to test and deploy 
apps. But for example, if you sat a user in front of say Outlook thick client 
and the Outlook web apps, it’d be a rare person who’d choose the web version 
for the UI. And how many business apps are built better than Outlook OWA? It’s 
not great but it’s better than the web based business apps in most companies.

Regards,

Greg

Dr Greg Low
1300SQLSQL (1300 775 775) office | +61 419201410 mobile│ +61 3 8676 4913 fax
SQL Down Under | Web: www.sqldownunder.com<http://www.sqldownunder.com>


On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 7:11 PM +1100, "Ken Schaefer" 
<k...@adopenstatic.com<mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com>> wrote:
We used to have everything as thick-client apps. And then every time we had to 
upgrade an OS, we have to regression test, and sociability test 1000+ apps. 
That’s a huge waste of time.
Then there’s the deployment issues of pushing thousands of apps out to 
thousands/tens of thousands/hundreds of thousands of endpoints.

When you talk about building a LoB app – well, that works when you have 1, or 2 
apps. It doesn’t scale.

Instead, we’re now using a browser as a virtual OS (with hardware, networking 
etc. abstracted away to the real OS), with an application UI and some logic 
delivered as text at run-time, and the non-GUI parts centralised.

And when we look at all the possible ways of building apps, and the choices 
being made by both developers of apps, and buyers of apps, it seems the 
market’s been pretty unequivocal about the preferred method.

Why it’s not much better/faster than before, is probably down to immaturity. If 
you want an app that does something that we were able to do 20 years ago, then 
that’s trivial to implement. But what the market wants is apps to do things 
that haven’t been done before.

From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com<mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com> 
[mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On Behalf Of Greg Low
Sent: Tuesday, 21 November 2017 5:51 PM
To: ozDotNet <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com<mailto:ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com>>
Subject: RE: Creating a browser-based product

But when a business just wants a line of business app, are these good answers 
now? Do they care if it could be used by billions of people? The odd one might 
care. Most won’t.

Won’t they be more concerned with taking 6 or 8 times longer, and costing 
proportionately more?

Not every app is at the high-end. Most aren’t.

And now I watch daily nightmares around deploying web apps too.

What exactly have we done to ourselves?

Regards,

Greg

Dr Greg Low

1300SQLSQL (1300 775 775) office | +61 419201410 mobile│ +61 3 8676 4913 fax
SQL Down Under | Web: www.sqldownunder.com<http://www.sqldownunder.com/> 
|http://greglow.me<http://greglow.me/>


From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com<mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com> 
[mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com<mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com>] On 
Behalf Of Craig van Nieuwkerk
Sent: Tuesday, 21 November 2017 4:46 PM
To: ozDotNet <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com<mailto:ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com>>
Subject: Re: Creating a browser-based product

I'm not sure this is much more of an issue now than it was. Back in the day we 
had to decide between Delphi, VB, Powerbuilder, C++ among others when building 
a Windows app. And once we decided that we had to work out which third party 
libraries we wanted to use with them.

If I take an old 15 year old Delphi app I have it would take me the best part 
of a week to get it compiling again now if I had to build the dev machine from 
scratch.

On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Greg Low 
<g...@greglow.com<mailto:g...@greglow.com>> wrote:
So then we’re back to why business apps take so very long to build nowadays, 
and why no-one can seem to decide which tools to use. Either way, as an 
industry, our productivity when building apps is poor.


Reply via email to