WebAssembly? You could port the clr to it so you can run webforms in a
browser. Greg will want to have your babies as a result.

On Wed., 22 Nov. 2017, 8:48 pm Tony Wright, <[email protected]> wrote:

> After all this time it means that the browser is ripe for disruption, and
> it might not even be a variant of what we've been doing so far... But what
> is it?What would it look like?
>
> On 22 Nov 2017 8:38 PM, "Ken Schaefer" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Greg Harris
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, 22 November 2017 3:44 PM
>> *To:* ozDotNet <[email protected]>
>> *Subject:* Re: Creating a browser-based product
>>
>>
>>
>> Plugins like Silverlight and Flash made web apps open to using a lot more
>> of the client machine’s resources to provide an interactive experience.
>> But, the industry has not supported these plugins for some reason I fail to
>> fully understand.
>>
>> Because Adobe Flash was more bugs than actual working code? The cost of
>> supporting Flash made it unappealing to people who pay the bills?
>>
>> If we cannot use Silverlight or Flash and fat clients are too hard /
>> expensive to install, you are back to the dumb terminal browser plus
>> Javascript again.
>>
>> Yes, and no. There’s offline storage, and some execution, that can be
>> offloaded to browsers.
>>
>> Look at compute intensive apps like 3D modelling or video editing, they
>> could never be done properly with today’s browser technology!
>>
>> Nothing is binary. At some point, the benefit of running a thick client
>> native app is greater than the cost of maintaining it.
>>
>> But those use cases seem to be shrinking year-on-year.
>>
>> Or maybe even a win forms app, because it is fast, I have 100% control *and
>> it is not really that hard to install*!
>>
>> The technical cost of your one app isn’t that much. But the total cost of
>> supporting a desktop does not increase linearly with the number of apps. It
>> increases exponentially, and thus doesn’t scale.
>>
>>
>>
> --
David Connors
[email protected] | @davidconnors | https://t.me/davidconnors | LinkedIn | +61
417 189 363

Reply via email to