wmn over wpan? p2pfoundation.net/Arduino ...leverage iBeacon? (random thoughts)
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 2:45 AM, grarpamp <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 5:09 AM, danimoth <[email protected]> wrote: > > A problem which could rise is the 'incentive' for peers to continuosly > > providing bandwidth and disk space to store messages. I'm a simple dude, > > with a mailflow of ~5 email per day. Why I should work for you, with > > your ~10000 mail per day for all your mailing list? > > I think this is one of many design choices to be made. > > Extra bandwidth is hard to avoid, unless the topology is > point(sender)-to-point(recipient). Yet with that, there is no effort made > to hide who is physically talking to who. We want to try to defeat this > type of analysis, so we can't be simply point-to-point. > ie: bittorrent and today's email are point-to-point, no multihop. > > Next is storage (mix) vs. latency (tunnels). This seems less clear to > me when up against analysis. Filling circuits (tunnels) with chaff > seems interesting. And with deliverey directly to your recipient over > some tunnel circuit, you don't have to build in complex message redundancy > protocols (more storage float outstanding) to ensure your message 100% > gets there when 90% of the nodes go offline taking your stored message > with them. You also get direct realtime delivery confirmation too. > > > Somewhere on this list (or p2p-hackers?) there was a post of mine, > > regardings an economic incentive between peers, which could be a > > solution, but as always technical problems arose, like pricing the > > services and a fair exchange between peers. > > The question arises, how does one provide free anonymous transport > to those anons who simply can't pay because they are anon? How > do you 'get users' when the mentality is 'for free'? Bittorrent/Tor are > free and seem to work ok. Though it's also probably not unreasonable > to suggest (and harder to enforce) that you get 1:1 what resources you > donate to it. ie: I need to push 1GiB this month, so I need to provision at > minimum 1+Nx1GiB to do that... 1 for me, Nx1 for the net due to my use > (where N is some impact ratio inherent in the design of the net, such > as number hops.) > _______________________________________________ > p2p-hackers mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers >
_______________________________________________ p2p-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
