On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Christian Huitema
> So we end up with a substantial background noise over the inter-continental
> connections,

Other than for latency issues in our protocols, there's enough
fiber to generally ignore our global traffic impact... torrent, video
and cloud are dominating that, not messaging anymore.

>> Scaling to 10B is going to change that much, 5 more bins, 40 more host
>> to ping every 15 minutes.

> I believe this is actually an issue. The number of pings per host scales as
> O(log N), which means the amount of maintenance traffic scales as O(N log N)
> -- more than linearly with the size of the network. Given the nature of the
> DHT, the addresses to be pinged

> and the amount of noise will grow more than linearly with the
> number of nodes in the network.

I think the question is, can we do what we want to do within
the bandwidth that our target users have available to them...
such as say a 56k channel, 128k, 512k, etc. If we're using
32 of 56k for maintenance, that may leave little left for the
signal you want to send through.
_______________________________________________
p2p-hackers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers

Reply via email to