Hopefully the mailing list is working again.

On 12/24/2013 02:09 AM, danimoth wrote:
> A problem which could rise is the 'incentive' for peers to continuosly
> providing bandwidth and disk space to store messages. I'm a simple dude,
> with a mailflow of ~5 email per day. Why I should work for you, with
> your ~10000 mail per day for all your mailing list?

Bittorrent works pretty well and handles peers with widely varying
latencies and bandwidth.  It has a very simple algorithm, you prefer
peers providing you the best bandwidth, tit for tat.

Why not do the same thing?  You look for a N peers to trade for your
inbox size * redundancy factor.  Someone with 100x the email needs
either larger or more peers to trade with.

If a peer uses too much bandwidth, if you are polite you notify them, if
not they should notice at the next check and look for a peer to replace you.

> Somewhere on this list (or p2p-hackers?) there was a post of mine,
> regardings an economic incentive between peers, which could be a
> solution, but as always technical problems arose, like pricing the
> services and a fair exchange between peers.

I've seen many complicated proposed systems with reputation, micro
payments, etc.  While academically interesting I think tit-for-tat
should work just fine for this purpose.  Trade a chunk of storage with a
peer and set the redundancy/replication factor to whatever you are
comfortable with.  If you want to track down peers you actually know,
all the better.

_______________________________________________
p2p-hackers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers

Reply via email to