[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > I'm gonna go with _no_. The amount of time it is saturated > is just a blip.
I'm going with "no" as well. And note that my previous note about computing bandwidth based on accurate RTT and accurate window calculation assumes that you have enough pending data that you are actively driving the window to maximum size and probing for loss. If not, then you'll just calculate your (lower) actual consumed bandwidth. Matthew Kaufman [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.amicima.com _______________________________________________ p2p-hackers mailing list p2p-hackers@zgp.org http://zgp.org/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers _______________________________________________ Here is a web page listing P2P Conferences: http://www.neurogrid.net/twiki/bin/view/Main/PeerToPeerConferences
