https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065758
--- Comment #6 from Richard Shaw <hobbes1...@gmail.com> ---
Are you going to post new spec and SRPM?
I would rename the package to python-omniORB as well and use:
%global realname omniORBpy
or upname, sourcename, etc, to use in the Source: tag and %setup.
As far as the sub packages, is the -libs package useful without the python
sub-package?
Also, as I've found out from experience, you can't use %{?_isa} with a noarch
package. Just let yum figure it out :)
I think after that you should only have 2 or 3 packages total instead of four,
in with your current method there is no omniORBpy package so nothing should
require it, but after you rename it that will no longer be a problem anyway. I
see 3 packages max:
python-omniORB (noarch, Requires: %{name}-libs = %{version}-%{release})
python-omniORB-libs
python-omniORB-libs-devel (Requires: %{name}-libs%{?_isa} =
%{version}-%{release})
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
