https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065758
--- Comment #10 from Richard Shaw <hobbes1...@gmail.com> --- Ok, I thought about it and I think we still have two options... 1. omniORBpy for the libraries (Do we really have to append -libs?) omniORBpy-devel and python-omniORB (noarch) OR 2. Like before, move the noarch stuff into /var/lib64 for x86_64 builds. There should not be a guideline problem with this. IIRC, keeping the noarch bits with a package that also has arch specific libraries is permissible. The only downside to this method is we will be duplicating the noarch files if someone has both i686 and x86_64 packages installed. I think I like option one better and would negate the need for the "realname" macro. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
