https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065758
--- Comment #9 from Sandro Mani <manisan...@gmail.com> --- And now I guess I remember why I called the src.rpm omniORBpy: I'd have to make the main package noarch but the subpackage arch. I think the only way to do that is to have an empty main package and the subpackages arch and noarch. So I'd be back having - empty package omniORBpy - noarch package python-omniORB - arch packges python-omniORB-libs, python-omniORB-devel Any better ideas? I'll request acls for omniORB (I think that is what Haïkel was suggesting in 783064) so that we can better deal with the conflicting files. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
