Thank you Rishi.  

-----Original Message-----
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Rishi D
Mack
Sent: 07 December 2012 10:59
To: 'PC Audio Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Accessibility of Adobe Audition

If you're gana perchis adobe audition, I think your best bet will be with
sonar if you want multitrack. And oh yeh. Reaper is good too. I also think
there's a way to use soney plugins with sonar. I use  sonar 8.5 everyday at
work. Maby  I can check and see. It is accessabel with caketalking, or j
scripts. Which ever one you want. I use cake talking for sonar. Though, I'm
looking to see If we can be able to use other vsts with  cake talking.


i

-----Original Message-----
From: Samuel Wilkins [mailto:clevercl...@gwilkins.co.uk] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 1:54 PM
To: 'PC Audio Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Accessibility of Adobe Audition

Thank you Steve for that.  I think then it looks like Audition is more
trouble than its worth, and it may be ebst trying out the Sound Forge and
Reeper demos.  

-----Original Message-----
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Steve
Jacobson
Sent: 04 December 2012 16:19
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Accessibility of Adobe Audition

In case this matters, I also really liked Audition's Noise Reduction.
However, I feel as though the Sound Forge Noise reduction 
is just as good but one needs to play with it some.  For example, the Sound
Forge noise reduction plug-in as four different modes, 
and certain modes work better with certain kinds of content.  I didn't feel
I had to work as hard at Audition's noise reduction to 
get good results, but if you are forced away from Audition, I think you can
do all right with the Sound Forge noise reduction 
plug-in if you experiment with settings..

Best regards,

Steve Jacobson

On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 08:27:01 -0500, Merv Keck wrote:

>Adobe Audition still has the best noise reduction I have ever seen on the 
>PC. Before losing most of my vision I never used anything else but Adobe 
>Audition 3 for multitrack editing. However, since March of 22011 it has
been 
>too difficult for nme to use it since it is not very speech friendly. I
kept 
>waiting for a new version to come out but it never did. I'm going to 
>download Reaper today and give it a try.

>-----Original Message----- 
>From: Hamit Campos
>Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 11:21 PM
>To: 'PC Audio Discussion List'
>Subject: RE: Accessibility of Adobe Audition
>I used Audition professionally for a long time and still miss it very much.
>Actually I should care because I believe this does surround sound too no?

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Samuel
>Wilkins
>Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 12:44 PM
>To: 'PC Audio Discussion List'
>Subject: RE: Accessibility of Adobe Audition

>The reason I am interested in using Adobe Audition is because of its
>multitrack editing capabilities, as I have some tracks I would like to
edit,
>and I would like to be able to do this at home with Window-Eyes.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Vítek
>Sent: 02 December 2012 18:32
>To: PC Audio Discussion List
>Subject: Re: Accessibility of Adobe Audition

>Hi Sam,

>My view might be a little subjective but from what I've tried out in the
>past when I got myself Adobe Audition just to take a look at it got totally
>worse than e.g. 2.1 version of Adobe Audition when you know they changed
>their label from Cool Edit which was the predecessor of that one. I wasn't
>confortable with that as many objects were placed without any shortcut keys
>on the screen beyond the menu so OK it was possible to grab them using the
>virtual mouse and crowling around but it was a real pain. It has the
>standard menu from what I remember and maybe they improved some particular
>things of that I can't tell but generally the older version were incredible
>having most of things in menu reachable via the keyboard unlike the latest
>versions. But maybe somebody knowing more of that will chime in. I say the
>most blind-friendly one is Sound Forge:).

>For the record I don't think it'll be better with Window Eyes as the
>universal way of the layout and localizing the object is identical to all
>screen readers regardless of whether it's NVDA Jaws or Window Eyes etc.



>Tapin-radio coordinator
>URL: http://www.tapinradio.com/
>Facebook: http://facebook.com/tapinradio
>Twitter: http://twitter.com/tapin_radio
>Skype: tapinradio
>  ----- Puvodní zpráva -----
>  Od: Samuel Wilkins
>  Komu: PC Audio Discussion List
>  Odesláno: 2. prosince 2012 16:21
>  Predmet: Accessibility of Adobe Audition


>  Hello everyone, I am considering migrating to Adobe Audition.  However, I
>  was wondering how accessible the latest version is with a screen reader.
>I
>  am using Window-Eyes as my reader.  Thank you.


>  To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
>  pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org

>  __________ Informace od ESET NOD32 Antivirus, verze databaze 6966
>(20120314) __________

>  Tuto zpravu proveril ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

>  http://www.eset.cz


>To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
>pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


>To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
>pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


>To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
>pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 


>To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
>pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org





To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org

Reply via email to