Thank you Rishi. -----Original Message----- From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Rishi D Mack Sent: 07 December 2012 10:59 To: 'PC Audio Discussion List' Subject: RE: Accessibility of Adobe Audition
If you're gana perchis adobe audition, I think your best bet will be with sonar if you want multitrack. And oh yeh. Reaper is good too. I also think there's a way to use soney plugins with sonar. I use sonar 8.5 everyday at work. Maby I can check and see. It is accessabel with caketalking, or j scripts. Which ever one you want. I use cake talking for sonar. Though, I'm looking to see If we can be able to use other vsts with cake talking. i -----Original Message----- From: Samuel Wilkins [mailto:clevercl...@gwilkins.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 1:54 PM To: 'PC Audio Discussion List' Subject: RE: Accessibility of Adobe Audition Thank you Steve for that. I think then it looks like Audition is more trouble than its worth, and it may be ebst trying out the Sound Forge and Reeper demos. -----Original Message----- From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Steve Jacobson Sent: 04 December 2012 16:19 To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Accessibility of Adobe Audition In case this matters, I also really liked Audition's Noise Reduction. However, I feel as though the Sound Forge Noise reduction is just as good but one needs to play with it some. For example, the Sound Forge noise reduction plug-in as four different modes, and certain modes work better with certain kinds of content. I didn't feel I had to work as hard at Audition's noise reduction to get good results, but if you are forced away from Audition, I think you can do all right with the Sound Forge noise reduction plug-in if you experiment with settings.. Best regards, Steve Jacobson On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 08:27:01 -0500, Merv Keck wrote: >Adobe Audition still has the best noise reduction I have ever seen on the >PC. Before losing most of my vision I never used anything else but Adobe >Audition 3 for multitrack editing. However, since March of 22011 it has been >too difficult for nme to use it since it is not very speech friendly. I kept >waiting for a new version to come out but it never did. I'm going to >download Reaper today and give it a try. >-----Original Message----- >From: Hamit Campos >Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 11:21 PM >To: 'PC Audio Discussion List' >Subject: RE: Accessibility of Adobe Audition >I used Audition professionally for a long time and still miss it very much. >Actually I should care because I believe this does surround sound too no? >-----Original Message----- >From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Samuel >Wilkins >Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 12:44 PM >To: 'PC Audio Discussion List' >Subject: RE: Accessibility of Adobe Audition >The reason I am interested in using Adobe Audition is because of its >multitrack editing capabilities, as I have some tracks I would like to edit, >and I would like to be able to do this at home with Window-Eyes. >-----Original Message----- >From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Vítek >Sent: 02 December 2012 18:32 >To: PC Audio Discussion List >Subject: Re: Accessibility of Adobe Audition >Hi Sam, >My view might be a little subjective but from what I've tried out in the >past when I got myself Adobe Audition just to take a look at it got totally >worse than e.g. 2.1 version of Adobe Audition when you know they changed >their label from Cool Edit which was the predecessor of that one. I wasn't >confortable with that as many objects were placed without any shortcut keys >on the screen beyond the menu so OK it was possible to grab them using the >virtual mouse and crowling around but it was a real pain. It has the >standard menu from what I remember and maybe they improved some particular >things of that I can't tell but generally the older version were incredible >having most of things in menu reachable via the keyboard unlike the latest >versions. But maybe somebody knowing more of that will chime in. I say the >most blind-friendly one is Sound Forge:). >For the record I don't think it'll be better with Window Eyes as the >universal way of the layout and localizing the object is identical to all >screen readers regardless of whether it's NVDA Jaws or Window Eyes etc. >Tapin-radio coordinator >URL: http://www.tapinradio.com/ >Facebook: http://facebook.com/tapinradio >Twitter: http://twitter.com/tapin_radio >Skype: tapinradio > ----- Puvodní zpráva ----- > Od: Samuel Wilkins > Komu: PC Audio Discussion List > Odesláno: 2. prosince 2012 16:21 > Predmet: Accessibility of Adobe Audition > Hello everyone, I am considering migrating to Adobe Audition. However, I > was wondering how accessible the latest version is with a screen reader. >I > am using Window-Eyes as my reader. Thank you. > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org > __________ Informace od ESET NOD32 Antivirus, verze databaze 6966 >(20120314) __________ > Tuto zpravu proveril ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > http://www.eset.cz >To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
