It's not though. It's a recorder with a music player so to speak.

-----Original Message-----
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dave
Scrimenti
Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2013 8:32 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: LS7 OR LS100?

I find it surprising that the DM520 is marketed as a dictation recorder when
it doesn't have most of the features of Olympus's other dictation recorders
such as dss files, encryption, and overwrite, insert, and append.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nick Giannak" <n...@hkcradio.com>
To: "PC Audio Discussion List" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2013 8:02 PM
Subject: Re: LS7 OR LS100?


> None of these are marketed as dictation recorders. The DM520 is, and 
> the
> LS7 sounds almost identical to it, thus I call it a glorified 
> dictation recorder. In effect, I am saying, ehre and now, that for 
> professional field recordings, especially with anything like higher 
> output mics, the
> LS7 is a failure.
> On 9/7/2013 5:23 PM, Dave Scrimenti wrote:
>> Actually, none of these are dictation recorders. Dictation recorders 
>> allow punching in etc. They also use small files for easy emailing. 
>> And provide encryption for security. As to which one to buy, it 
>> depends on what you need. If you don't require truly professional 
>> sound, the LS-7 is inexpensive and sounds quite good. The LS-100 is 
>> better, but you'll pay for it, and I don't know if the multitrack
function is accessible.
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nick Giannak" <n...@hkcradio.com>
>> To: "PC Audio Discussion List" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
>> Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2013 4:06 PM
>> Subject: Re: LS7 OR LS100?
>>
>>
>>> How about neither?
>>>     The LS7 was nothing more than a glorified dictation recorder. I 
>>> should know, I've seen them, and they were not all that dissimilar 
>>> to my DM520, which was a dictation recorder.
>>>     the LS100 is good for musicians, and was a trendsetter for 
>>> Olympus recorders. It is very good...and expensive, of course. If we 
>>> could all afford them, we'd all own them, because they are very, very
flexable.
>>>     How about the LS14? The LS14 is exactly what would happen if the 
>>> Olympus LS7 and LS100 had a kid. In general, it's the LS100 in 
>>> miniature, but it has the tresmic system from the LS7, but most 
>>> importantly, the LS100's microphone preamps, or very similar 
>>> thereof. It handles high output microphones very well, it's got 
>>> smart mode which is really awesome (check the website), and it does 
>>> it at a $199 that won't break the bank too hard.
>>> Thanks,
>>> nick
>>>  On 9/7/2013 3:59 PM, Olusegun -- Victory Associates LTD, Inc. wrote:
>>>> Hi Everyone:
>>>>
>>>> I'm in the market for a portable audio recorder and I am turned 
>>>> between the Olympus LS7 and LS100.  I'd appreciate reading your 
>>>> thoughts as to which of these two recorders would be a better 
>>>> purchase and why.  Much thanks for all help.
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>> Olusegun
>>>> Denver, Colorado
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
>>>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
>>>
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
>>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
> 


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org

Reply via email to