Hi Quan, The usage is the same as defined in RFC9256. Do you have any suggested text?
Thanks, Cheng -----Original Message----- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of xiong.q...@zte.com.cn Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2023 5:16 PM To: julien.meu...@orange.com Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15 Dear PCE WG, I support the WG LC of this draft. I reviewed this document in details and I think it is useful and reasonable for SRv6 networks with PCEP extension. Thanks the authors for the well-written draft and I have a suggestion for section 4.3.1 with text "V: The "SID verification" bit usage is as per Section 5.1 of [RFC9256]." Maybe it is better to add more description on how to use the V bit for SID verification. Best Regards, Quan <<[Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15 <<julien.meu...@orange.com Mon, 13 February 2023 17:38 UTCShow header <<Dear PCE WG, This message starts a 2-week WG last call on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15 [1]. Please, be express any comments you have about <<this document using the PCE mailing list. This WGLC will end on Tuesday 28th February 2023. Thanks, Julien -- [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-<<ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6/ _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
