Hi Quan, We have addressed your comments in the latest version, please check it.
Thanks, Cheng The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6/ There is also an HTML version available at: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-16.html A diff from the previous version is available at: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-16 From: xiong.q...@zte.com.cn [mailto:xiong.q...@zte.com.cn] Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2023 3:25 PM To: d...@dhruvdhody.com Cc: Cheng Li <c...@huawei.com>; pce@ietf.org; draft-chen-pce-sr-mpls-sid-verificat...@ietf.org; Zhangka <zhan...@huawei.com> Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15 Hi Dhruv, Thanks for your reply! I agree with you and it is much better to align with SR-MPLS using LSP-ERROR-CODE TLV. Best Regards, Quan Original From: DhruvDhody <d...@dhruvdhody.com<mailto:d...@dhruvdhody.com>> To: 熊泉00091065; Cc: c...@huawei.com<mailto:c...@huawei.com> <c...@huawei.com<mailto:c...@huawei.com>>;pce@ietf.org <pce@ietf.org<mailto:pce@ietf.org>>;draft-chen-pce-sr-mpls-sid-verificat...@ietf.org <draft-chen-pce-sr-mpls-sid-verificat...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-chen-pce-sr-mpls-sid-verificat...@ietf.org>>;zhan...@huawei.com <zhan...@huawei.com<mailto:zhan...@huawei.com>>; Date: 2023年02月27日 13:06 Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15 Hi Quan, Cheng, I think it is best if this is aligned with SR-MPLS i.e this draft- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-sr-mpls-sid-verification/ That draft suggests using LSP-ERROR-CODE TLV. We can move the IANA allocation to this document as it is nearing WGLC and the SR-MPLS draft can simply reuse it! Thoughts? Thanks! Dhruv On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 9:16 AM <xiong.q...@zte.com.cn<mailto:xiong.q...@zte.com.cn>> wrote: Hi Cheng, Thanks for your reply! The suggested text maybe like this following shown. " * V: When this bit is set to 1, the PCC should perform the SID verification in validity of an Explicit Candidate Path as described in as per Section 5.1 of [RFC9256]. When a segment list of an explicit candidate path be invalid, a PCErr message should be sent. " I am not sure about the last PCEP error part. Maybe the PCC should notify the PCE when the candidate path is invalid. Best Regards, Quan Original From: ChengLi <c...@huawei.com<mailto:c...@huawei.com>> To: 熊泉00091065;julien.meu...@orange.com<mailto:00091065%3bjulien.meu...@orange.com> <julien.meu...@orange.com<mailto:julien.meu...@orange.com>>; Cc: pce@ietf.org<mailto:pce@ietf.org> <pce@ietf.org<mailto:pce@ietf.org>>; Date: 2023年02月20日 15:14 Subject: RE: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15 Hi Quan, The usage is the same as defined in RFC9256. Do you have any suggested text? Thanks, Cheng -----Original Message----- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org>] On Behalf Of xiong.q...@zte.com.cn<mailto:xiong.q...@zte.com.cn> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2023 5:16 PM To: julien.meu...@orange.com<mailto:julien.meu...@orange.com> Cc: pce@ietf.org<mailto:pce@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15 Dear PCE WG, I support the WG LC of this draft. I reviewed this document in details and I think it is useful and reasonable for SRv6 networks with PCEP extension. Thanks the authors for the well-written draft and I have a suggestion for section 4.3.1 with text "V: The "SID verification" bit usage is as per Section 5.1 of [RFC9256]." Maybe it is better to add more description on how to use the V bit for SID verification. Best Regards, Quan <<[Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15 <<julien.meu...@orange.com<mailto:julien.meu...@orange.com> Mon, 13 February 2023 17:38 UTCShow header <<Dear PCE WG, This message starts a 2-week WG last call on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15 [1]. Please, be express any comments you have about <<this document using the PCE mailing list. This WGLC will end on Tuesday 28th February 2023. Thanks, Julien -- [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-<<ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6/ _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org<mailto:Pce@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org<mailto:Pce@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
