Hi Quan, Cheng, I think it is best if this is aligned with SR-MPLS i.e this draft- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-sr-mpls-sid-verification/
That draft suggests using LSP-ERROR-CODE TLV. We can move the IANA allocation to this document as it is nearing WGLC and the SR-MPLS draft can simply reuse it! Thoughts? Thanks! Dhruv On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 9:16 AM <xiong.q...@zte.com.cn> wrote: > Hi Cheng, > > > Thanks for your reply! > > The suggested text maybe like this following shown. > > " * V: When this bit is set to 1, the PCC should perform the SID > verification in validity of an Explicit Candidate Path as described in as > per Section 5.1 of [RFC9256]. When a segment list of an explicit candidate > path be invalid, a PCErr message should be sent. " > > I am not sure about the last PCEP error part. Maybe the PCC should notify > the PCE when the candidate path is invalid. > > > Best Regards, > > Quan > > > > > > Original > *From: *ChengLi <c...@huawei.com> > *To: *熊泉00091065;julien.meu...@orange.com <julien.meu...@orange.com>; > *Cc: *pce@ietf.org <pce@ietf.org>; > *Date: *2023年02月20日 15:14 > *Subject: **RE: [Pce] WG Last Call for > draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15* > Hi Quan, > > > The usage is the same as defined in RFC9256. Do you have any suggested text? > > Thanks, > Cheng > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of xiong.q...@zte.com.cn > Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2023 5:16 PM > To: julien.meu...@orange.com > Cc: pce@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15 > > Dear PCE WG, > > > I support the WG LC of this draft. I reviewed this document in details and I > think it is useful and reasonable for SRv6 networks with PCEP extension. > > Thanks the authors for the well-written draft and I have a suggestion for > section 4.3.1 with text "V: The "SID verification" bit usage is as per > Section 5.1 of [RFC9256]." Maybe it is better to add more description on > how to use the V bit for SID verification. > > Best Regards, > Quan > > > > > > > <<[Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15 > <<julien.meu...@orange.com > Mon, 13 February 2023 17:38 UTCShow header <<Dear PCE WG, This message > starts a 2-week WG last call on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15 [1]. > Please, be express any comments you have about <<this document using the PCE > mailing list. This WGLC will end on Tuesday 28th February 2023. Thanks, > Julien -- [1] > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-<<ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6/ > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
