Dear Chairs and authors, I’ve reviewed this document and support its adoption. I have one comment which is for authors’ consideration (after adoption).
Section 6 currently considers that the ID space allocated to PCE could be withdrawn by resetting the PCE session. If possible some less interruptive mechanism for ID space withdrawal or update may be considered. Best regards, Jie From: Dhruv Dhody <d...@dhruvdhody.com> Sent: Friday, May 17, 2024 7:10 PM To: pce@ietf.org Cc: pce-chairs <pce-cha...@ietf.org>; draft-li-pce-controlled-id-sp...@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-controlled-id-space-16 Hi WG, This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-li-pce-controlled-id-space-16 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-pce-controlled-id-space/ Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list. Please respond by Monday 3rd June 2024. Please be more vocal during WG polls! Thanks! Dhruv & Julien
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list -- pce@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to pce-le...@ietf.org
