Hi WG, I’ve reviewed the document and from my understanding this draft proposes useful extension to the PCEP by allowing Path Computation Clients (PCCs) to delegate identifier allocation to Path Computation Elements (PCEs). This functionality can be beneficial for managing identifiers like MPLS labels or Segment Routing (SR) identifiers within a network. Support adoption for the document of draft-li-pce-controlled-id-space.
Best Xuesong From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:d...@dhruvdhody.com] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2024 7:10 PM To: pce@ietf.org Cc: pce-chairs <pce-cha...@ietf.org>; draft-li-pce-controlled-id-sp...@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-controlled-id-space-16 Hi WG, This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-li-pce-controlled-id-space-16 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-pce-controlled-id-space/ Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list. Please respond by Monday 3rd June 2024. Please be more vocal during WG polls! Thanks! Dhruv & Julien
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list -- pce@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to pce-le...@ietf.org
