Install all to FAT32 or use a virtual machine application like VMWare www.vmware.com or Virtual PC www.connectix.com and all partitions can be visible and you can have all running concurrently too. It's how I do it for Linux, XP, 98, and 95. Oh and I have Mac OS 8.1 running under Basilisk2 http://basilisk2.cjb.net/

Have fun.

Peter Kaulback

In the hour of 08:28 PM 08/03/2003 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] spoke this:
Hey Gang,

I am wondering about what I thought was going to be a simple issue but
maybe not so simple after all.

I need to have Win98 SE, Win2K Pro, and WinXP Pro, all on the same
system. Originally, I thought I read in the Microsoft tech info that if
I installed 98 first, then 2K next, and finally XP, and put each in a
separate partition, that I would be able to have a tripe boot option
system. But I am wondering if I read or misread that. Also, since I will
be having an extended partition as well, for Dos and other logical
drives.

I need for all partitions to be visible, no matter which OS is booted
currently. I have no intentition in ever using NTFS again, unless maybe
under threat of death, so that should not be an issue (the reason is for
another email I will be posting). I am doing work in each OS for various
people, which is the reason I need to have all three (and Dos) on the
same machine.

Boot Magic and similar seem to work their magic by making one partition
the active primary and the other partitions non-active and effectively
invisable - NOT the state I want to end up in.

Other than what I thought I read about a triple boot option, which
hopefully is true (but might not be), I understand that there are some
utilities or settings that can be used with XP to will accomplish what I
want - any ideas, sugguestions, or ideas???

Ralph
============= PCWorks Mailing List =================
Don't see your post? Check our posting guidelines &
make sure you've followed proper posting procedures,
http://pcworkers.com/rules.htm
Contact list owner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribing and other changes: http://pcworkers.com
=====================================================

Reply via email to