Hallo, [EMAIL PROTECTED] hat gesagt: // [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > however, since i am currently planning to replace [gemhead] with an > abstraction, which would allow you define the behaviour as you like > it, i don't want to add complexity to the current implementation. > don't know when this will be implemented yet, but it is rather high on > my todo list.
And of course one could do a little wrapper [gemhead-off] immediatly for this. Or even wrap the whole double gemhead into an abstraction as attached. Ciao -- Frank
#N canvas 339 288 724 390 10; #X obj 116 158 dgemhead; #X obj 116 133 tgl 15 0 empty empty empty 17 7 0 10 -262144 -1 -1 1 1; #X obj 116 247 translateXYZ; #X obj 142 215 unpack 0 0; #X obj 116 278 square 0.1; #X obj 118 73 gemwin; #X msg 118 47 create \, 1; #X msg 217 144 -2.72 1.52 \, -1.12 0.56 \, 3.04 -1.68 \, -2.8 3.92 \, -2.48 3.28 \, -0.4 -0.72 \, -3.92 -2.64 \, 1.2 -3.28 \, -1.04 -2.16 \, 1.76 -0.24 \, 0.8 -1.68 \, 3.36 -2.88 \, 0.88 -3.52 \, 0.72 2.64 \, -3.28 -1.68 \, 2.72 -1.04 \, 1.92 -2.56 \, -1.68 2 \, 0.32 3.52 \,; #X text 259 119 do something here:; #X connect 0 0 2 0; #X connect 0 1 3 0; #X connect 0 2 7 0; #X connect 1 0 0 0; #X connect 2 0 4 0; #X connect 3 0 2 1; #X connect 3 1 2 2; #X connect 6 0 5 0; #X connect 7 0 0 1;
#N canvas 458 354 450 300 10; #X obj 173 181 gemhead; #X obj 104 123 loadbang; #X msg 104 149 0; #X obj 318 93 gemhead; #X obj 173 24 inlet; #X obj 173 247 outlet; #X obj 173 84 t b a; #X obj 235 247 outlet; #X obj 318 246 outlet; #X obj 318 216 b; #X obj 74 26 inlet; #X connect 0 0 5 0; #X connect 1 0 2 0; #X connect 2 0 0 0; #X connect 3 0 9 0; #X connect 4 0 6 0; #X connect 6 0 0 0; #X connect 6 1 7 0; #X connect 9 0 8 0; #X connect 10 0 3 0;
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list