Frank Barknecht a écrit :
Hallo,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] hat gesagt: // [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
however, since i am currently planning to replace [gemhead] with an
abstraction, which would allow you define the behaviour as you like
it, i don't want to add complexity to the current implementation.
don't know when this will be implemented yet, but it is rather high on
my todo list.
And of course one could do a little wrapper [gemhead-off] immediatly for
this. Or even wrap the whole double gemhead into an abstraction as
attached.
the best would be not to use the double gemhead trick, but the "repeat" (or
until) trick instead : it's faster, and don't have this problem, so i think it's easier
to understand.
see attachment
cyrille
Ciao
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
#N canvas 366 83 738 436 10;
#X obj 118 73 gemwin;
#X msg 118 47 create \, 1;
#X msg 121 154 -2.72 1.52 \, -1.12 0.56 \, 3.04 -1.68 \, -2.8 3.92
\, -2.48 3.28 \, -0.4 -0.72 \, -3.92 -2.64 \, 1.2 -3.28 \, -1.04 -2.16
\, 1.76 -0.24 \, 0.8 -1.68 \, 3.36 -2.88 \, 0.88 -3.52 \, 0.72 2.64
\, -3.28 -1.68 \, 2.72 -1.04 \, 1.92 -2.56 \, -1.68 2 \, 0.32 3.52
\,;
#X text 256 126 do something here:;
#X obj 121 107 gemhead;
#X obj 121 237 gemlist;
#X obj 121 131 t b a;
#X obj 121 259 separator;
#X obj 121 216 t b l;
#X obj 121 309 translateXYZ;
#X obj 148 284 unpack 0 0;
#X obj 122 331 square 0.1;
#X connect 1 0 0 0;
#X connect 2 0 8 0;
#X connect 4 0 6 0;
#X connect 5 0 7 0;
#X connect 6 0 2 0;
#X connect 6 1 5 1;
#X connect 7 0 9 0;
#X connect 8 0 5 0;
#X connect 8 1 10 0;
#X connect 9 0 11 0;
#X connect 10 0 9 1;
#X connect 10 1 9 2;
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
